Foordy
International Captain
Contributor
- Mar 4, 2008
- 34,743
- 41,409
[st_table="45%"][st_tr][st_td_row="2"][/st_td_row][st_td]wizards rage - nzwarriors.com[/st_td][/st_tr][st_tr][st_td="0.7"]JOINED: .April 18, 2016
MESSAGES: 6,602
REACTIONS: 17,497[/st_td][/st_tr][/st_table]
In situations like that the highest bid value should be the value that goes against the cap wherever the player plays. That’s their market value.
Signing a player for unders because you offer ‘other intangible benefits’ circumvents the money based design of the cap. They ‘other intangible benefits’ actually has a $300k value in your example.
Auction the players value, then they chose a club?
Smash em bro
you think player agents are shady now ... wait until they start exploiting that rule