CROSS FORUM NRL 2023 Round 16 Discussion

[Super Freak]

That was nice from Manly.

 

[NZWarriors.com]

[st_table="45%"][st_tr][st_td_row="2"]

[/st_td_row][st_td]Beastmode - nzwarriors.com[/st_td][/st_tr][st_tr][st_td="0.7"]JOINED: .March 7, 2015
MESSAGES: 12,935
REACTIONS: 26,102[/st_td][/st_tr][/st_table]

---

Nice hands

---

 

[LittleDavey]

Clever from Gutho.

He waited until he was in the in-goal before stripping the ball. That made it legal.

Isn't that what Reece did a couple weeks ago, or wasn't the player OVER the line yet?

 

[Super Freak]

Isn't that what Reece did a couple weeks ago, or wasn't the player OVER the line yet?

He wasn't over the line yet when Reece stripped the ball.

Once they're over the line, they're fair game.

 

[Foordy]

He wasn't over the line yet when Reece stripped the ball.

Once they're over the line, they're fair game.

absolutely he was.

it was ruled by the bunker that the opposition player wasn't in the act of scoring though (just being in the in goal wasn't enough)

 

[NZWarriors.com]

[st_table="45%"][st_tr][st_td_row="2"]

[/st_td_row][st_td]Beastmode - nzwarriors.com[/st_td][/st_tr][st_tr][st_td="0.7"]JOINED: .March 7, 2015
MESSAGES: 12,936
REACTIONS: 26,102[/st_td][/st_tr][/st_table]

---

[st_table="45%"][st_tr][st_td_row="2"]

[/st_td_row][st_td]Foordy - broncoshq.com[/st_td][/st_tr][st_tr][st_td="0.7"]JOINED: .March 3, 2008
MESSAGES: 31,062
Reaction Score: 34,033[/st_td][/st_tr][/st_table]

---

absolutely he was.

it was ruled by the bunker that the opposition player wasn't in the act of scoring though (just being in the in goal wasn't enough)

---

JOIN THE #KEVOLUTION

Stupid rule if accurate

---

 

[Dexter]

absolutely he was.

it was ruled by the bunker that the opposition player wasn't in the act of scoring though (just being in the in goal wasn't enough)

Same happened in the Knights game with opposite ruling to this eels game.
They truly can find a way to **** themselves up these refs

 

[Organix]

Well, Manly have no direction. Bullymore has regressed so much. Parra has been getting some kind calls, but they are far more coordinated than Manly.

 

[NZWarriors.com]

[st_table="45%"][st_tr][st_td_row="2"]

[/st_td_row][st_td]KPWarrior - nzwarriors.com[/st_td][/st_tr][st_tr][st_td="0.7"]JOINED: .May 19, 2012
MESSAGES: 1,192
REACTIONS: 2,047[/st_td][/st_tr][/st_table]

---

Far out I might get 1 right

---

 

[Foordy]

This is a Seibold coached side that I remember.

Defence must be a dirty word in Seibold's training sessions

 

[I bleed Maroon]

This is a Seibold coached side that I remember.

Defence must be a dirty word in Seibold's training sessions

Not just that. They crack the sooks and drop their heads when things don't go their way exactly like we used to under Seibald.

 

[Nashy]

This is a Seibold coached side that I remember.

Defence must be a dirty word in Seibold's training sessions

Speakers and music though man. They'll come good.

 

[Super Freak]

absolutely he was.

it was ruled by the bunker that the opposition player wasn't in the act of scoring though (just being in the in goal wasn't enough)

He was still in the field of play and wasn't trying to get down to score, Reece pulls him towards the goal line than strips the ball, which you can't do.

When the players whole body is in the in-goal, they're classed as in the act of scoring and Reece stripping the ball would have been legal.

It's exactly what Gutho did. He waited until they were in the in-goal and stripped it.

 

[ChewThePhatt]

Manly are amazing!
Clearly so incredibly well coached...
It pretty to watch.

 

[Morkel]

He was still in the field of play and wasn't trying to get down to score, Reece pulls him towards the goal line than strips the ball, which you can't do.

When the players whole body is in the in-goal, they're classed as in the act of scoring and Reece stripping the ball would have been legal.

It's exactly what Gutho did. He waited until they were in the in-goal and stripped it.

Except today Best had pushed a good 3 metres in to the in-goal, had the ball stripped, and it was still ruled as not in the act of scoring.

 

[Big Pete]

I don't like the Gutherson call. There's nothing in the rules to say the player has to be in the goal, just that they were attempting to ground the ball. Paseka is held up by four players up right and then has the ball stolen. I'd argue Burgess went a lot closer against Melbourne when the Storm were penalised.

It's not a black and white rule but the way it's been ruled it's usually been treated as a last resort.

 

[Super Freak]

The ball was loose but surely that was going backwards before the Manly player touched it.

 

[NZWarriors.com]

[st_table="45%"][st_tr][st_td_row="2"]

[/st_td_row][st_td]bruce - nzwarriors.com[/st_td][/st_tr][st_tr][st_td="0.7"]JOINED: .September 1, 2015
MESSAGES: 27,572
REACTIONS: 41,009[/st_td][/st_tr][/st_table]

---

Bunker again!!!

---

Trainspotter