mrslong
International Rep
- Mar 25, 2008
- 13,302
- 13,492
It was an elbow tap to the back of the head. He should get a "grade 1 being a grub charge", but let's not pretend that he was trying to knock Frizz out etc.
**** I was off there but I remember being deadset fuming about it. He would have been a grade 1 Hia in todays rules. He was unconcious from memory. He didn't get 10 in the bin then? And 2 weeks is fucking atrocious.thats them admitting he meant to hit a guy in the back of the head but they just don't care. That situation is among the most dangerous situations I've ever seen on a footy field, very high risk of permanent brain damage considering He brought his full weight onto him when he was defenceless and unawareOates may have come off but he returned later in the game. Remember he had an opportunity to steal the game late but Damien Cook came up with a boot lace tackle to deny him.
Roberts was charged over it and missed two weeks.
It was basically the minimum penalty on both accounts.**** I was off there but I remember being deadset fuming about it. He would have been a grade 1 Hia in todays rules. He was unconcious from memory. He didn't get 10 in the bin then? And 2 weeks is fucking atrocious.thats them admitting he meant to hit a guy in the back of the head but they just don't care. That situation is among the most dangerous situations I've ever seen on a footy field, very high risk of permanent brain damage considering He brought his full weight onto him when he was defenceless and unaware
It was basically the minimum penalty on both accounts.
It was a bitter pill for Broncos fans to swallow, especially when they threw the book at Pangai Jr only days prior for a contentious crusher tackle on Maloney.
The Knights reportedly scored in an eight tackle set. the NRL refs are so incompetent that they can't even count to 7 (was off a seven tackle set)