- Apr 9, 2012
- 12,617
- 14,356
Its really hard to believe Newcastle are actually offering such things....Why would anyone be stupid enough to sign Milf for three years? He needs a short term deal to keep fit.
Its really hard to believe Newcastle are actually offering such things....Why would anyone be stupid enough to sign Milf for three years? He needs a short term deal to keep fit.
Well...Wayne Bennett wants to.why would anyone sign milf
Fox article saying Knights are going to offer Milford a 3 year deal
Apparently has a handshake deal for a 1 year contract with the Dolphins so Knights are trying to get him to reneg on that.
Its really hard to believe Newcastle are actually offering such things....
so does any coach.Well...Wayne Bennett wants to.
He's got more runs on the board than you or I.
Thats what I'm sayin.... are they?Well the question is, are they? Or is Milford's management claiming it (and "leaking it") to get the Dolphins to stretch a bit further?
so does any coach.
For sure. You make a great point.Whatever the actual amount it's clear that a lot of clubs are very poorly run, and having even a decent management is a huge leg up over most of your competition. Get some very good key people like Brisbane seem to now have and it's possible to be up the pointy end of the ladder consistently.
Yeah roosters are looking wobbly as it is, last thing they need is a disruptive force like Lodge.Even if you can get him pro rata and a small amount- why? Lodge has been a negative influence no matter where he's been.
He won't contribute to anything in that eight weeks.
Even if you can get him pro rata and a small amount- why? Lodge has been a negative influence no matter where he's been.
He won't contribute to anything in that eight weeks.
think it’s more that he thinks he knows better than most and let's everyone know , hence his run ins.There's been mixed reports regarding Lodge. The popular belief is he's a negative influence because he's a player that doesn't want to put in etc. But from what I've been hearing, he's been a negative influence because he doesn't tolerate people not putting in and gets up the players if they don't.
He was one of the few Warriors players that was trying out on the field. He was always trying to come up with a big run or a big hit to inspire the players. That's not really going to be an issue at the Roosters so I don't see the downside.
Yeah and he plays selfish on the field. From what I observed he is another powerful forward who isn’t able to cop surrendering for a quick play the ball in the right area of the field for his halves.think it’s more that he thinks he knows better than most and let's everyone know , hence his run ins.
There's been mixed reports regarding Lodge. The popular belief is he's a negative influence because he's a player that doesn't want to put in etc. But from what I've been hearing, he's been a negative influence because he doesn't tolerate people not putting in and gets up the players if they don't.
He was one of the few Warriors players that was trying out on the field. He was always trying to come up with a big run or a big hit to inspire the players. That's not really going to be an issue at the Roosters so I don't see the downside.
He could be on his sixth club soon and has had issues with everyone; Warriors gave him 700k to go away after another blow up with someone.
At some point in time you have to reflect on yourself and think maybe it's not everyone else.