NRL Players and family members in hot water

There is no debate to the consent to the sex, it is the sharing of the recordings without their consent or knowledge that is the issue.
Err, not my point either. I never mentioned anything about consent rather I was pointing out how the players involved are being demonised and crucified for their "treatment of women" yet no mention of the women's APPARENT agreement to engage in rough sex and what many are describing as humiliating and degrading behaviour.
 
Err, not my point either. I never mentioned anything about consent rather I was pointing out how the players involved are being demonised and crucified for their "treatment of women" yet no mention of the women's APPARENT agreement to engage in rough sex and what many are describing as humiliating and degrading behaviour.
I've seen and know of people who truly enjoy (and even need) much "worse", and absolutely have every right to!
But they know and don't deny that behaviour is degrading and humiliating, which is often the reason they want it in the first place. They would also be loath to see it publicly exposed (with very few exceptions) because of that knowledge.
 
I've seen and know of people who truly enjoy (and even need) much "worse", and absolutely have every right to!
But they know and don't deny that behaviour is degrading and humiliating, which is often the reason they want it in the first place. They would also be loath to see it publicly exposed (with very few exceptions) because of that knowledge.
Totally agree. I didn't intend any of my post to be seen as comment on the consent to be filmed angle rather the complete absence of any public comment on the willingness of all parties to engage in such behaviour. It all seems to be about respecting women and nothing mentioned about the women who are eager participants. The rights and wrongs of publicly exposing this is covered as is the 'terrible' behaviour of the men but completely absent is an acknowledgement that some women are fans of this debauchery.
 
Totally agree. I didn't intend any of my post to be seen as comment on the consent to be filmed angle rather the complete absence of any public comment on the willingness of all parties to engage in such behaviour. It all seems to be about respecting women and nothing mentioned about the women who are eager participants. The rights and wrongs of publicly exposing this is covered as is the 'terrible' behaviour of the men but completely absent is an acknowledgement that some women are fans of this debauchery.

And men. I could never do it while my mate sat there taking care of himself. Wtf?
 
And men. I could never do it while my mate sat there taking care of himself. Wtf?
Funny thing is that this kind of thing is not new. 35 years ago a friend and I would regularly engage in threesomes and there were plenty of eager ladies keen for fun and games. I might add the rough treatment angle was not part of the activities but I'm sure it was around in other scenarios. Initially I was a bit uncomfortable with being in the same space as another naked male but that faded pretty quickly and let me be clear, there was no male on male contact!
 
Funny thing is that this kind of thing is not new. 35 years ago a friend and I would regularly engage in threesomes and there were plenty of eager ladies keen for fun and games. I might add the rough treatment angle was not part of the activities but I'm sure it was around in other scenarios. Initially I was a bit uncomfortable with being in the same space as another naked male but that faded pretty quickly and let me be clear, there was no male on male contact!

Gross.
 
Funny thing is that this kind of thing is not new. 35 years ago a friend and I would regularly engage in threesomes and there were plenty of eager ladies keen for fun and games. I might add the rough treatment angle was not part of the activities but I'm sure it was around in other scenarios. Initially I was a bit uncomfortable with being in the same space as another naked male but that faded pretty quickly and let me be clear, there was no male on male contact!

A 3some I understand but is it really a 3some when one guy just sits there watching and wanking?
 
Initially I was a bit uncomfortable with being in the same space as another naked male but that faded pretty quickly and let me be clear, there was no male on male contact!

Thats what you all say [emoji6][emoji6][emoji6]
 
It’s not gay if your eyed are closed.
 
It would be kinda funny though if he hit the reporter and the reporter floored him. Stick to women Ben.
 
I don't like Barba I think the bloke is a grub, but if I didn't know any better I'd say that's some scummy "journalism" at work right there. They went out of their way to harass him until he snapped so they had a juicy story under their belt.
Agreed. **** the journos are scums. He's destroyed his life, leave him alone.
 
Last edited:
D1cBbuaUcAAWZjo.jpg:large
 
Last edited:

Agree with nearly everything Matt has said here, although I can't go with 'no worse sin than this' I take his point.

I don't like Barba, hate what he has done and am glad he is out of the game for good; but enough is enough. Leave the guy alone, he has lost basically everything so just let him get on with his life. I can understand Ben's outburst, his life could probably not be lower at the moment and this vulture is following him around poking him.
 

Active Now

  • bb_gun
  • Dexter
  • broncoscope
  • Old Mate
  • Hoof Hearted
  • whykickamoocow
  • johnny plath
  • Bucking Beads
  • Harry Sack
  • 1910
  • Fozz
  • Santa
  • BroncosAlways
  • Financeguy
  • bert_lifts
  • Sproj
  • Behind enemy lines
  • ChewThePhatt
... and 4 more.
Top
  AdBlock Message
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.