Roosters talk turkey with Mitchell Pearce - Big Contract $$$

Kimlo

Kimlo

International Captain
Senior Staff
Apr 26, 2008
34,580
35,552
THE Sydney Roosters are set to reward Mitchell Pearce for his elevation to State of Origin football by offering him a contract extension which would make him among the highest paid players in the game.

The Australian understands that the Roosters have opened talks with Pearce's management over a revised deal which would bind him to the club until 2012.

Pearce's contract runs for a further two years, but the Roosters are keen to head off interest in the 19-year-old.

Given his rise to Origin football, and the widespread expectation he will become one of the best players in the game, Pearce would expect to command the sort of money reserved for representative elite.


The Roosters' desire to extend Pearce's contract highlights the rapid improvement in his game and his escalating standing in the competition.

He only signed his latest contract in April last year, but since putting pen to paper Pearce has become one of the game's premier halfbacks, culminating in his representative debut for City this year.

Provided he takes his place in Origin III next Wednesday at ANZ Stadium, he will become the second youngest NSW player in Origin football and most predict it will be the beginning of one of the great Origin careers.

Pearce's manager Mike Newton confirmed an initial meeting had taken place with the Roosters and talks were ongoing. He also stressed Pearce had no desire to leave the club which gave him the opportunity to play first grade last year.

"He's happy where he is at the moment," Newton said. "He's very, very happy at the Roosters. He has no intention of going anywhere.

"He's learning a lot off Freddie (Brad Fittler). If we can come to an agreement, we will look at it."

Newton said any decision on Pearce's future would be made in consultation with the teenager's father, former NSW captain and coach Wayne Pearce.

"I talk to most parents until they get to a position where they're capable of making decisions themself," Newton said.

Read the rest at

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/st ... 22,00.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It's either me or the roosters don't have a f*cking cap I mean C'mon this is beyond ridiculous

Omeley, Mason, Anasta, Myles, Minchello, Fitzgibbon, Tupou, Pearce,

If as they are saying is even remotely true, Then I will go ahead and UNDERESTIMATE and say that all these players are on 300k(some of them are on 350 or even 400)

But If they were all on 300k that's 2.1 million on those players alone for 8 players ALONE

meaning there is 2 mill left for 17 players which works out to 117K each for the remaining 17 players, I mean surely there is something SUS going on here... Salary cap my Bottocks!

Only tupou and shillington are leaving to my knowledge.
 
Far out, one game in origin and all of a sudden a players price skyrockets! Same with Wallace. Pearce hasn't even played yet and he's set to be rewarded with a massive contract for it. He's 19, played a handful of games, and yes, they've been mostly good games, but it's a lot of pressure on a kid. Seems ridiculous to make him one of the highest paid in the game when he's not playing with that sort of ability yet.
 
He definitely has a big future. I dunno if he's worth it now, but they may as well try to keep him so no one else steals him.
 
The Rock said:
The amount of quality players we've had in the past and still never managed to go over the cap is quite remarkable.

Very remarkable [icon_shady [icon_shady
 
The Rock said:
Hammo said:
[quote="The Rock":2d4ka4qj]The amount of quality players we've had in the past and still never managed to go over the cap is quite remarkable.

Very remarkable [icon_shady [icon_shady

Exactly. [icon_wink[/quote:2d4ka4qj]

Except we retained them, you usually retain cheaper than you buy, whereas 4 of the players they bought as rep players.
 
He probably doesnt deserve it yet but he will get it in the future, he will be a star one day.

Well I think it would be niave for us to say we wouldnt have rorted the cap at some stage, every club has and every club will given the chance to.

I find it hard to believe but I am not really going to complain about it, if anything it means they will lack depth in key positions, which means they will be in massive trouble if they get injury hit or they have to provide a stack of players to rep teams.
 
Add to that the fact that Fitzy isn't re-signed as yet, I think, with the Roosters - he's over 30 and any contract for next year will be worth next to nothing.

It looks sus, but the Roosters team of next year has nothing on some of the great teams that we've fielded.

Unfair to draw analogies and ineundo on the '06 team though. I think Hodges was still on the meagre contract from when he returned to us, and guys like Thaiday weren't origin players and thus weren't earning much coin. Not to mention how little the likes of Boyd and Perry would've been playing on!
 
mick! said:
Add to that the fact that Fitzy isn't re-signed as yet, I think, with the Roosters - he's over 30 and any contract for next year will be worth next to nothing.

It looks sus, but the Roosters team of next year has nothing on some of the great teams that we've fielded.

Unfair to draw analogies and ineundo on the '06 team though. I think Hodges was still on the meagre contract from when he returned to us, and guys like Thaiday weren't origin players and thus weren't earning much coin. Not to mention how little the likes of Boyd and Perry would've been playing on!

That is my point, They bought 4 off these guys off the dogs as ready made rep players, I mean we bought one rep player and we have to release about 4 people to make way.
 
broncospwn said:
mick! said:
Add to that the fact that Fitzy isn't re-signed as yet, I think, with the Roosters - he's over 30 and any contract for next year will be worth next to nothing.

It looks sus, but the Roosters team of next year has nothing on some of the great teams that we've fielded.

Unfair to draw analogies and ineundo on the '06 team though. I think Hodges was still on the meagre contract from when he returned to us, and guys like Thaiday weren't origin players and thus weren't earning much coin. Not to mention how little the likes of Boyd and Perry would've been playing on!

That is my point, They bought 4 off these guys off the dogs as ready made rep players, I mean we bought one rep player and we have to release about 4 people to make way.

True, but we still need to have a look at the rest of their team. Sa would be on nothing, and he's since become an international rep, as has Soliola. Kenny-Dowall would be on nothing, along with the Aubussons, Shackleton, Shillington, Perrett...
 
imo Wallace is a better all-round halfback then Pearce anyway.
 
side note - did ben ikin get a big contract after his 1st match in SOO?
 
gUt said:
imo Wallace is a better all-round halfback then Pearce anyway.

Agreed, and I still don't know why people are now saying "I'm glad he was picked, he's the long-term solution".

Exqueeze me? Seriously, if Wally hadn't been injured, surely he'd still get the gig? It's laughable anyway, we all know that NSW drop their halfback after one or two losses... [icon_lol1.
 
mick! said:
gUt said:
imo Wallace is a better all-round halfback then Pearce anyway.

Agreed, and I still don't know why people are now saying "I'm glad he was picked, he's the long-term solution".

Exqueeze me? Seriously, if Wally hadn't been injured, surely he'd still get the gig? It's laughable anyway, we all know that NSW drop their halfback after one or two losses... [icon_lol1.

Yeah, I mean i thought wallace was the long term solution [icon_lol1.
 
Wow, maybe many years down the track he might be one of the premier players, but WOW, this much hype already doesn't make much sense to me!
 
For a kid with a great kicking game and not a great deal else thats a big contract, I think he might have more natural talent than Wallace but certainly think Wallace is further along and has more balance to his game in terms of having sound passing, kicking and defense (wish he would run the ball occasionally though).
 
The Rock said:
Nothing annoys me more than people saying "Oh how he hell can this team be under the cap, look at these players etc etc." :roll: What about our team of 2006? Tate, Hodges, Berrigan, Lockyer, Webcke, Civoniceva etc....they were kept under the cap for many different reasons so why can't it apply to other teams as well? Broncos fans especially should never EVER claim 'salary cap rort' on any other team, ever. The amount of quality players we've had in the past and still never managed to go over the cap is quite remarkable.

Besides, know one really knows what players are getting so it's pointless to speculate.

As for the actual topic at hand (sorry, got side-tracked) - Roosters may regret offering Pearce that much. The kid is a talent that's for sure, but the only reason why he was picked in the NSW team was because of his combination with Anasta - He isn't really rep footy standard just yet and has plenty of learning to do. Way too premature for the Roosters to be creaming over the kid just yet.

the broncos players you listed all came through the broncos ranks. how many of the roosters players listed weren't through the roosters ranks? mason, o'meley, anasta, fitzgibbon, and myles all came at a high cost. it usually costs more to sign stars from other clubs.
 
The Rock said:
666 said:
[quote="The Rock":zhtza57a]Nothing annoys me more than people saying "Oh how he hell can this team be under the cap, look at these players etc etc." :roll: What about our team of 2006? Tate, Hodges, Berrigan, Lockyer, Webcke, Civoniceva etc....they were kept under the cap for many different reasons so why can't it apply to other teams as well? Broncos fans especially should never EVER claim 'salary cap rort' on any other team, ever. The amount of quality players we've had in the past and still never managed to go over the cap is quite remarkable.

Besides, know one really knows what players are getting so it's pointless to speculate.

As for the actual topic at hand (sorry, got side-tracked) - Roosters may regret offering Pearce that much. The kid is a talent that's for sure, but the only reason why he was picked in the NSW team was because of his combination with Anasta - He isn't really rep footy standard just yet and has plenty of learning to do. Way too premature for the Roosters to be creaming over the kid just yet.

the broncos players you listed all came through the broncos ranks. how many of the roosters players listed weren't through the roosters ranks? mason, o'meley, anasta, fitzgibbon, and myles all came at a high cost. it usually costs more to sign stars from other clubs.

Still, we had to re-sign them at some stage when we had other clubs chasing them for $ so it's the same thing really.[/quote:zhtza57a]

Actually, no it's not, If some club wanted to sign Wallace, I could almost guarantee you he would stay for less @ the broncos (not too much less though). Another club would have to pay overs to get Wallace, similar to what happened with hannat, dogs signed him for 350k, the broncos if they did re-sign him they could of probably got him for 250-300 MAX
 
Pearce will be the best halfback of the next decade. He'll be up there with Joey, Sterling and Stuart as the greatest halfbacks of all time.
 

Unread

Active Now

  • BroncsNBundy
  • levikaden
  • Dexter
  • GCBRONCO
  • theshed
  • marw
Top
  AdBlock Message
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.