You'll drop Gamble, but keep Croft?1. Niu
2. Oates
3. Farnworth
4. Staggs
5. Mead
6. Kelly
7. Croft
8. Kennedy
9. Turpin
10. Haas
11. Robati
12. Riki
13. Hetherington
14. Paix
15. Bullemor
16. Palasia
17. Flegler
lol whoops. Definitely meant to drop Croft and not GambleYou'll drop Gamble, but keep Croft?
Yikes
See, it can happen. Maybe Kevvie has just had an entire season of these whoops moments…lol whoops. Definitely meant to drop Croft and not Gamble
Pretty simple solution in Kevvies books. Drop Oates and Croft for Coates and Milford.This week will be an interesting test for Kevvie. Up until now he's followed this pattern:
1. Teams loses, fans and commentators identify a weak link.
2. Reporters arrive on same page as fans and commentators. Chicken lays egg. Egg becomes chicken. Ad infinitum.
3. Walters plays down said weak link. Says "yeah" a thousand times.
4. Team list Tuesday. Weak link is shuffled out, or sometimes named and dropped later in the week.
5. That's usually a half. And it's not the first time he's been scapegoated.
6. Commentators mock Walters for switching halves yet again.
Right now fans and commentators are calling out the "left edge defence" and "leadership." The captain is under pressure.
Will Walters have the nuts to drop the captain or merely shuffle the halves and wing again?
He'll drop Gamble.This week will be an interesting test for Kevvie. Up until now he's followed this pattern:
1. Teams loses, fans and commentators identify a weak link.
2. Reporters arrive on same page as fans and commentators. Chicken lays egg. Egg becomes chicken. Ad infinitum.
3. Walters plays down said weak link. Says "yeah" a thousand times.
4. Team list Tuesday. Weak link is shuffled out, or sometimes named and dropped later in the week.
5. That's usually a half. And it's not the first time he's been scapegoated.
6. Commentators mock Walters for switching halves yet again.
Right now fans and commentators are calling out the "left edge defence" and "leadership." The captain is under pressure.
Will Walters have the nuts to drop the captain or merely shuffle the halves and wing again?
We looked a bit clunky without him as well.If we can fix our defence we have points in us, Penrith looked a bit clunky without Cleary today maybe we can keep it close if we sort our issues.
my thoughts too. we'll lose after a gritty 60mins wherein we keep pace with them.funnily enough, we'll probably perform much better against the Panthers ... we tend to struggle against teams we should beat and are competitive against better teams (Melbourne being the exception)
**** i was mid season, Last season.What took you so long? I lost interest after shitty StG put 50+ on us.
Roosters haven't been that good and we do usually go alright against them.There's another win in there somewhere probably against the equally as pathetic Cowboys. Slight chance against the Warriors as well. Won't beat Newc ×2 especially if Ponga and Pearce are playing. Won't beat Penrith nor the Roosters. Doubt if we can topple Cronulla again. With a bit of luck, the Broncos could finish 6-18.
Hey you're pointing out the obvious again knowing all to well Kelly is due back, keep up the good workThis week will be an interesting test for Kevvie. Up until now he's followed this pattern:
1. Teams loses, fans and commentators identify a weak link.
2. Reporters arrive on same page as fans and commentators. Chicken lays egg. Egg becomes chicken. Ad infinitum.
3. Walters plays down said weak link. Says "yeah" a thousand times.
4. Team list Tuesday. Weak link is shuffled out, or sometimes named and dropped later in the week.
5. That's usually a half. And it's not the first time he's been scapegoated.
6. Commentators mock Walters for switching halves yet again.
Right now fans and commentators are calling out the "left edge defence" and "leadership." The captain is under pressure.
Will Walters have the nuts to drop the captain or merely shuffle the halves and wing again?
Confirmed theshed is Walters.He'll drop Gamble.
Probably. Everyone is up Brodie today. FWIW, I like Brodie, but agree he might be part of the problem. He tries hard, but like everyone in our backline seems to lack some critical skills.Hey you're pointing out the obvious again knowing all to well Kelly is due back, keep up the good work
Man that guy really hates on himself.Confirmed theshed is Walters.
Kelly has been heaps better than Croft . Croft has always been shocking in defence and not that good in attack.Probably. Everyone is up Brodie today. FWIW, I like Brodie, but agree he might be part of the problem. He tries hard, but like everyone in our backline seems to lack some critical skills.
I'm not as convinced replacing him is part of the solution though. Gun to my head, though, sure give Kelly another shot. Whatever.
Worth a shot, anyway. We could use a new halves combo. Or we could audition Staggs. Heck, why not?Kelly has been heaps better than Croft . Croft has always been shocking in defence and not that good in attack.