- Apr 21, 2015
- 1,741
- 1,294
I hope you mean just to the bench because that's the most I can see happening otherwise you will be done for the year.If not 1 of Boyd,Milford,Oates, is dropped this week I'm done with this year.
I hope you mean just to the bench because that's the most I can see happening otherwise you will be done for the year.If not 1 of Boyd,Milford,Oates, is dropped this week I'm done with this year.
This is why Milford was signed on big money. The big difference in these videos is other players are moving. That's why I've been defending Milford this year. When he gets the ball. No one else is there in support of moving.
The whole team is a rabble. Whoever the fullback is needs to be behind milford the entire game. Look at gutho. Has less talent than isaako or niu but so much bloody effort and always there in support. The try Wallace got at the end of the video, running hard onto the ball. None of our forwards do that.
Man, the biggest difference between now and then is determination. I don't think he's that far removed from the player he was there in terms of footwork or speed, a lot of the tries he used to score were from pure desire to get to the line. If you put him in the same scenario now as most of those tries he'd just succumb to the first contact or crab across field and put in a kick. I really don't know why his mentality has turned to shit..
Despite the Warriors in a bad place at the moment with Kearney gone and players supposedly thinking of going back to NZ..
they will beat us.
Two awful teams who are both a rabble for differing reasons and who are counting on each other to prop them up from the cellar. Flip a coin for this one.Despite the Warriors in a bad place at the moment with Kearney gone and players supposedly thinking of going back to NZ..
they will beat us.
I don't think pissing Croft off is any solution. For starters, neither he nor Milford can do much when the structures and shapes just aren't being implemented.
If you look at Croft's game, right at the start, when some optimism on my part appeared (briefly) he was set up TPJ with a nice pass as 1st receiver which led to TPJ dragging in 2 defenders and his offload put Niu into a hole, Niu who was following in support as a good FB ought to. Farnworth was out wide as was Coates. It was a good shape, it was quality edge play. We almost scored except for Niu's inexperience. It used TPJ's power on the edge to perfect effect.
Thing is, why didn't we replicate that throughout the game? That is what pisses me off. We do know what works but we don't do it enough.
Later, Croft put through a nice short kick behind the line for Herbie to score. Why only 1 kick for the whole game?
It's those things which frustrates me so much aside from our shitty defensive style. We have what it takes only we don't do it often enough.
He has played one game starting on a losing side. I don't see the point of playing him at all if you are going to drop a spine player after one game.So the rookie fullback had a 'solid' game and been named for a week again. I must have had my ignore-mediocrity glasses off when watching.
Bombed a try, shaky af under the high ball, a gift intercept try...I shudder to imagine the pages of comments shredding him to bits if his name had been Isaako.
FMD, fans have become just as tunnel visioned as our award winning rookie coach.
Was this the same as Fifita??
I actually think in 1-2 weeks time, Luke will be the one guiding the attack around the park, which will probably make our underperforming, misfiring halves job a bit easier (there were definitely glimpses last night).A key issue this. Who is calling the plays out there, in the middle, where it counts? Who's job is it. Given that we so often have " ... a forward standing, passed the ball then runs." nobody is calling any plays.
Usually, it is the hooker, like Smith. You build a structure around a key organiser. Maybe Luke needs to be given that role. I dunno. Back to that old chestnut - we need a game manager, a leader in the middle calling the plays, and we don't have one. I can't see it being Croft or Dearden - too young and inexperienced trying to sort out a dog's breakfast. Milford isn't a game manager - never was or will be. A core issue for mine that needs sorting.
I actually think in 1-2 weeks time, Luke will be the one guiding the attack around the park, which will probably make our underperforming, misfiring halves job a bit easier (there were definitely glimpses last night).
Of course, Seibold will then drop Luke for Turpin and shit will start to unravel again.
His kicking game is excellent though. Right on target, in the hands of the opposition player, every time. Except that out on the full, very out of character.
I was actually impressed with how Glenn tried to inspire the team with his defence, but you’re right, unless the other blokes buy into it (which Darius did, albeit too late in the game to actually matter), there is little else he can do.THIS.
For mine, this can't happen soon enough. I reckon it is the root cause of our mentality of failure on the park. When the chips are down, we have nobody out there in the middle where it counts, organizing and inspiring. Our shapes and structures, such as they are go to shit and nothing gets done to fix them. Players drop their heads, their shoulders and just give up. Glenn tries hard but he is not in the middle. Maybe put him at lock, away from the edges to help, however it is a key playmaker who has to lead, as does Smith.
Until that happens, nobody can fix this mess OTHER than getting the defensive pattern to change immediately, with the line moving up ata rate of knots to suffocate the opposition's forwards and their play makers. We give the opposition way too much room to organise and implement attacking plays. We know this, and that is on Seibold, as much as it is to get some leadership happening in the middle.