Morepudding
NRL Captain
- Dec 16, 2015
- 4,381
- 4,769
This is something i've found interesting for a while, particularly since Todd Greenburg has come out questioning whether there is enough talent to introduce another 2 NRL teams to the competition.
Todd Greenburg, and many others are of the belief that the competition would be considerably weaker if two new teams entered due to lack of development of juniors. This is something I agree with. My issue is, the NRL doesn't do anything to promote clubs investing in their juniors.
As far as I'm aware, clubs don't get any incentive in terms of salary cap concessions for developing juniors, or for giving juniors their first grade debuts. There is the 'long service' concession, although that numbers is very small in the grand scheme of things and plays very little impact on player retention, and also applies to a very small percentage of players.
The Broncos develop a lot of junior talent, however with the salary cap we obviously can't retain these players. I think it would be great to see a significant salary cap concession for players who have been signed with a club for X years, with this starting for some players when they are 13 or 14 years old and signed through those development pathways.
All you need to do is look at NRL teams at the moment to see the quality of players that have come through the Brisbane system with players like Ben Hunt, Corey Norman, Ash Taylor, Jai Arrow, Dane Gagai and many other players on huge contracts and playing some rep football.
I guess the main purpose of this post is to bring this discussion up. Do you think the NRL should promote development by allowing bigger concessions? Sure the Broncos and Panthers would likely have the biggest gain from this in the short term, but it would then promote other clubs to do the same and spend that money on junior pathways. This would lead to higher quality players, probably increase the number of junior players, and potentially improve the quality of the game, as well as increase the fan supporter base. If this then allowed for more teams to be introduced into the competition, it would also result in an increased salary cap meaning more money for the players and the development of better fascilities as well.
For me, it's a no brainer. I'd be happy with something as simple as every year with a club brings you a 5% loyalty bonus to a maximum of 50%. They could perhaps limit how many players are allowed to have this bonus or something like that, but I really think it would help.
Todd Greenburg, and many others are of the belief that the competition would be considerably weaker if two new teams entered due to lack of development of juniors. This is something I agree with. My issue is, the NRL doesn't do anything to promote clubs investing in their juniors.
As far as I'm aware, clubs don't get any incentive in terms of salary cap concessions for developing juniors, or for giving juniors their first grade debuts. There is the 'long service' concession, although that numbers is very small in the grand scheme of things and plays very little impact on player retention, and also applies to a very small percentage of players.
The Broncos develop a lot of junior talent, however with the salary cap we obviously can't retain these players. I think it would be great to see a significant salary cap concession for players who have been signed with a club for X years, with this starting for some players when they are 13 or 14 years old and signed through those development pathways.
All you need to do is look at NRL teams at the moment to see the quality of players that have come through the Brisbane system with players like Ben Hunt, Corey Norman, Ash Taylor, Jai Arrow, Dane Gagai and many other players on huge contracts and playing some rep football.
I guess the main purpose of this post is to bring this discussion up. Do you think the NRL should promote development by allowing bigger concessions? Sure the Broncos and Panthers would likely have the biggest gain from this in the short term, but it would then promote other clubs to do the same and spend that money on junior pathways. This would lead to higher quality players, probably increase the number of junior players, and potentially improve the quality of the game, as well as increase the fan supporter base. If this then allowed for more teams to be introduced into the competition, it would also result in an increased salary cap meaning more money for the players and the development of better fascilities as well.
For me, it's a no brainer. I'd be happy with something as simple as every year with a club brings you a 5% loyalty bonus to a maximum of 50%. They could perhaps limit how many players are allowed to have this bonus or something like that, but I really think it would help.