- Mar 5, 2008
- 30,080
- 19,062
- Thread starter
- #55
They score.
Our defence is all over the fucking shop.
Our defence is all over the fucking shop.
Storm Vs. Broncos *SPOILER*
- Thread starter ningnangnong
- Start date
- Status
- Mar 5, 2008
- 30,080
- 19,062
- Thread starter
- #56
Phew, no try.
- Mar 5, 2008
- 30,080
- 19,062
- Thread starter
- #58
Slater looks like he scored earlier, thank the referees for missing that.
- Mar 5, 2008
- 30,080
- 19,062
- Thread starter
- #61
The shape of our defensive line completely falls apart once we're under pressure.
We're starting to sting in tackles now...finally.
It seems like we're intentionally only keeping one or two in tackles, as though they want the line set quicker. That doesn't seem to be working. We need numbers in there to hit hard and prevent the quick play the ball.
It seems like we're intentionally only keeping one or two in tackles, as though they want the line set quicker. That doesn't seem to be working. We need numbers in there to hit hard and prevent the quick play the ball.
- Mar 5, 2008
- 30,080
- 19,062
- Thread starter
- #63
You're right guppy, absolutely no pressure whatsoever on the Storm when they're kicking.
- Mar 5, 2008
- 30,080
- 19,062
- Thread starter
- #66
Setu on, Sims off.
- Mar 5, 2008
- 30,080
- 19,062
- Thread starter
- #67
Penalty to Storm relieves the pressure we just worked up.
- Mar 5, 2008
- 30,080
- 19,062
- Thread starter
- #70
Get fucked.
Why can't anyone tackle Slater FFS?
Why can't anyone tackle Slater FFS?
Major JW Hochstetter
NRL Player
- Mar 4, 2008
- 1,480
- 28
Needless to say, Locky is really missing Wallace. Fighting hard, but our attacking options are screwed without a real halfback in the side. Not looking good now anyway with the Storm stretching their lead.
- Status
