I think the opposite, I think he got what he wanted and it was too much. He should have been on 'probation' and had support and check and balances around him.
Last edited:
NEWS The dirt has begun
- Thread starter McHunt
- Start date
I think the opposite, I think he got what he wanted and it was too much. He should have been on 'probation' and had support and check and balances around him.
- Jul 7, 2013
- 3,536
- 7,666
I tend to think his approach was just so different from what the playing group were used to that the messages never got through (I've long suspected that we aren't an overly smart bunch). He also effectively ripped the playing group apart and moved a lot of guys on. That probably hasn't been received well by the players.
- Jan 8, 2018
- 6,578
- 13,426
You may be right, but it does not explain why he never dropped Darbs throughout the whole time he was there. Conspiracy theories aside, I was perplexed at some of the things Darbs got away with and yet still never got dropped.
I believe that was his call, I don't think he wanted a senior player offside, I was told that it was the opposite to what is popular opinion- Seibold kept him in the team despite being advised he should go.
abashii
NRL Player
- Jul 14, 2014
- 2,874
- 5,910
It beggars belief that management would decide Wayne's not working, he's destroying the club and so forth, pick a radical new coach with a Harvard's endowment worth of new coaching philosophies and no ties to our playing group, then forbid him from dropping our highest profile poor performer. It's far more parsimonious to conclude Seibold was just out of his depth, struggling and piling on the poor decisions as the pressure weighed heavier upon him while the team burned and results evaporated.
- Mar 4, 2008
- 34,851
- 41,624
was "parsimonious" on your word of the day calendar ... and you've been dying to use it somewhere
Volvo Driver
QCup Player
- Jul 9, 2020
- 800
- 1,154
That was a bad thing???
- Aug 25, 2018
- 17,984
- 31,047
- Thread starter
- #44
Instead of punting him to Newcastle.
That was just because the Tigers couldn't even scrounge together the loose change to pay for Ivan fare that day.
- Aug 27, 2008
- 2,819
- 4,003
Posters by the truck load, in at least 6 different threads, have been sticking it to Lockyer for his work on the board.
Try reading before posting. Assists in credibility.
TevitaPaperbagJunior
BRL Player
- Aug 25, 2020
- 35
- 31
I am merely a fan with a dream and I don’t have time to have read through each article on the site. You’ll have to forgive me for not being Einstein.
- Aug 19, 2019
- 5
- 3
Locky sure isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. Limitless footy talent, limited boardroom appeal one would think.
- Aug 27, 2008
- 2,819
- 4,003
Then don't get uppity. Also, you don't need to be Einstein to read. A lot of people do it.
