C
Coxy
International Captain
- Mar 4, 2008
- 31,212
- 1,886
- Thread starter
- #19
I mean nothing of the sort.
All I'm saying (yet again) is that if we're going to punish innocuous, minor, accidental high tackles with suspensions, then surely EVERY punch, whether it connects or not, which is a deliberate attempt to injure your opponent illegally, should be met with a suspension too.
If we want to "bring back the biff", then we should basically throw away the judiciary charges and just worry about the really bad ones.
Our game keeps cleaning itself up but fighting is one area they have simply not done it to the same level.
I guarantee you there's kids who are asking their dads why Brett White is allowed to play this weekend despite knocking Price out with a punch (after throwing half a dozen others) while Player X has been suspended for accidentally hitting another player high in a tackle with no harm done?
And yes there'll be parents who ask themselves why fighting is treated so leniently.
All I'm saying (yet again) is that if we're going to punish innocuous, minor, accidental high tackles with suspensions, then surely EVERY punch, whether it connects or not, which is a deliberate attempt to injure your opponent illegally, should be met with a suspension too.
If we want to "bring back the biff", then we should basically throw away the judiciary charges and just worry about the really bad ones.
Our game keeps cleaning itself up but fighting is one area they have simply not done it to the same level.
I guarantee you there's kids who are asking their dads why Brett White is allowed to play this weekend despite knocking Price out with a punch (after throwing half a dozen others) while Player X has been suspended for accidentally hitting another player high in a tackle with no harm done?
And yes there'll be parents who ask themselves why fighting is treated so leniently.