broncospwn said:Wallace is signed till next year.
Chumba said:There's no reason for panic,
Most years of late we start the season with a 5 star team and high hopes; we win a few, not enough tho and go quietly into the night at years end after mid year slump, small fight back and blame it all on rep footy and injuries. While next year we'll have a weak pack, no quality hooker, a new back line, new coach and very little depth... sounds perfect.
Hammo said:this only person that should be panicking is rnabokov and his 100.
rnabokov said:Chumba said:There's no reason for panic,
Most years of late we start the season with a 5 star team and high hopes; we win a few, not enough tho and go quietly into the night at years end after mid year slump, small fight back and blame it all on rep footy and injuries. While next year we'll have a weak pack, no quality hooker, a new back line, new coach and very little depth... sounds perfect.
This year you can't not blame injuries, stupido brain explosion suspensions, and Origin, and I still don't think we're a real chance of winning without Lockyer, and to a lesser extent, Wallace.
Well next year, I reckon our pack is ok although another good prop would be handy, Marsh should suffice as hooker given Locky and Wallace continue their combination, we'll have Folau who with Hodges can be match-winners, Henjak is no fool and our depth I reckon is not that bad.
For mine, it's 2010 that's the real worry - unless we retain Wallace, start grooming a 5/8 for Locky's eventual retirement and develop a real leader and organizer.
Hammo said:Exactly. I think Cameo meant that Seymour was meant to be orsm, however didn't turn out so great. He's not doing to bad for the Sharks mind you...not setting the4 world on fire, but far more solid then when he was with us.