Nashy
Immortal
Senior Staff
- Mar 5, 2008
- 54,599
- 34,927
As per the other thread. They are actually playing like crap IMO.
kimlo said:Beads6 said:kimlo said:Beads6 said:Only time will tell, I think we can and shoudl but if we don't its only round 4. Melbourne have been playing poorly and a due for a turn around, lets just hope it aint next week. The Premiership hangover looks to have snapped them up.
I don't think melbourne have been playing poorly but cronulla and roosters, have been playing absolutely brilliant. I wouldn't say its the storms poor form rather the oppostions superb form. No denying roosters are a very good side, so no suprise they beat them and i think the broncos will be just too strong.
They might have crocker and inglis back but we have lockyer, hunt, parker and clinton back
Lockyer>inglis, Parker>Crocker Hunt>slater. So for returns we are just as well in the returns department for next week.(not to mention ennis is back and he was just superb)
A melbourne team playing half decent doesn't lose two games in a row! Roosters and Sharks are playing well but not good enough to knock off an inform Storm side. _woohoo_
Ummm.. Sorry there, A inform roosters will knock off an inform Storm, the salary cap has been made so basically any team on their day can beat any other team. Saying a inform storm team wouldn't lose two in a row is a bit silly considering they have versed two very serious premiership contenders. Now im sure if they had challenged anyone BUT these two teams they wouldn't have lost twice in a row(melbourne just managed to scrape a win against sharks last year 17-16 and they were *inform* then)
Melbourne havn't been out of form, they have just been beaten by simple BETTER teams, they played the warriors round one, they were brilliant and smashed them, but the roosters and sharks are no warriors.
So your basically saying that melbourne has easily the best team in the competition to be able to beat roosters(a excellent side this year) and sharks(another great side this year) playing only half decent. A bit silly if you ask me.
kimlo said:I watched the roast, and sunday footy show, and they were criticizing cooper cronk for not being a creative halfback who struggles when things go well, which i think is 100% true, cooper has been blessed with the most structured and organized team in the comp, now that there sort of starting to lose it cooper has this new pressure which he is not handling very well, where as a good half back would be more creative and do something, he really poor.
I don't know whether its bellamy not allowing him some freedom, buy seriously cooper watch a few videos of Scot Prince and see how he does things, best half back in the buisness IMO, thurston has been terrible this year to date, it will be a shame if gets picked for origin over Prince.
My 2 cents worth :)
Nashy said:kimlo said:I watched the roast, and sunday footy show, and they were criticizing cooper cronk for not being a creative halfback who struggles when things go well, which i think is 100% true, cooper has been blessed with the most structured and organized team in the comp, now that there sort of starting to lose it cooper has this new pressure which he is not handling very well, where as a good half back would be more creative and do something, he really poor.
I don't know whether its bellamy not allowing him some freedom, buy seriously cooper watch a few videos of Scot Prince and see how he does things, best half back in the buisness IMO, thurston has been terrible this year to date, it will be a shame if gets picked for origin over Prince.
My 2 cents worth :)
Explain Thurston please.
Nashy said:What's to say Cronk isn't off form?
The Rock said:Cronks never been a creative halfback. He is a organisational halfback with a top notch kicking game and that's all. It works for the Storm, and that's all that matter for them I guess.