- Sep 6, 2013
- 66,037
- 84,257
Walsh is a definite.
For sure.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Walsh is a definite.
We've got wahs at magic round... so unaffected.I hate the origin period for this exact reason and while its hard to feel any pity for them the Panthers for example could be absolutely pulled apart again and I think looking at the Draw play the Warriors in NZ again during origin, its just simply not an even playing field.
Well I did say highly likely, but they went with Hammer last year and may go that way purely because he's better under the high ball.Walsh is a definite.
Google tricked me lol. Even better. Links to storm, bulldogs, Titans, Newcastle, dragons. Im sure they'd have no subconscious bias.
No wonder cleary went to the panel with the Penrith reps on it.
So is there any broncos representation on the panel or this committee? Like zero. The biggest club in the nrl cant have anyone? Im sure theres no ex broncos living in Sydney lol.
Only the toughest people act tough on the internet.Oh FFS !
Buy a fcking tin foil hat .
Only the toughest people act tough on the internet.
You got me! I post my theories on the specific teams forum about them being dudded. Wow! And water is wet. Now settle down jake the mussOnly the most paranoid people post about their paranoia on the internet .
Google tricked me lol. Even better. Links to storm, bulldogs, Titans, Newcastle, dragons. Im sure they'd have no subconscious bias.
No wonder cleary went to the panel with the Penrith reps on it.
So is there any broncos representation on the panel or this committee? Like zero. The biggest club in the nrl cant have anyone? Im sure theres no ex broncos living in Sydney lol.
You got me! I post my theories on the specific teams forum about them being dudded. Wow! And water is wet. Now settle down jake the muss
I would be having mariner as a smokey. He has really improved his yardage and can finish. He would not look out of place in the QLD jersey.Off the top of my head:
Definites:
- Patty
- Payne
Highly likely:
- Walsh (likely picked on the bench at minimum)
Possibles:
- Staggs
- Ezra
... Can easily see both Staggs and Ezra getting picked on the bench
Others:
- Gehamat Shibasaki (there last year... might be there if his form improves)
- Ben Hunt (has been there before... break glass for Qld if needed)
- Brendan Piakura (was around the Qld squad last couple years)
- Jesse Arthars (was around the Qld squad last year)
The big thing this year is they've extended the bench to 6 and there is still an extra man, so that will be 20 players per team (excluding the extra squad players that stay during the week), which means 40 starters are being removed from the competition.
When injuries are factored in that will be a lot of players missing during the origin period and teams will be seriously stretched.
Origin will have to be standalone soon, because the above is just insanely disruptive.
To be honest the NRL should make it mandatory that the 20th man in origin (i.e. the guy that is just there as HIA cover) should have to come from a team on the bye.
Highly unlikely they will play and even if they get on due to foul play or whatever there are still 2 other guys on the bench that you picked before that 20th man.
I would be having mariner as a smokey. He has really improved his yardage and can finish. He would not look out of place in the QLD jersey.
Granted i dont watch as much footy these days so not familiar with how the incumbant wingers are going.
Ezra could score 3, lay on another 2, it wouldn't matter.
He doesn't like Ezra and it has nothing to do with footy, he can make it sound like it's footy related, it's not.
Mariner would likely be in the Qld team if he was eligible.I would be having mariner as a smokey. He has really improved his yardage and can finish. He would not look out of place in the QLD jersey.
Granted i dont watch as much footy these days so not familiar with how the incumbant wingers are going.
So its got no broncos on it then would be the answer instead of deflecting lol.I am 100% that even if the MRC was all Broncos you would complain. Madge and Donaghy are on the coaching and CEO committee, and you complain about that.
So its got no broncos on it then would be the answer instead of deflecting lol.
And I wasnt aware of madge being on the panel, guessing he requested it, which is smart given the recent rule changes happening so fast.
Or they could just have 17 people on the committee? Or rotate the members? Or not have 2 from the same club? Just some thoughts.Maybe they could get every player since 1998 to be on the panel, all 3500 could get together and watch every game then no one isn't represented.
That makes no sense, he was on the panel that took the rules changes to the ARLC. He knew exactly what the plan was going to be.
Full strength side has 9 players missing... 10 if you count Billy... then the next men up are also injured or missing... but yeah "every team is dealing with injuries"Johns giving Reynolds his dues for his strong general play kicking and game management display in the past two matches. Slater making out missing double digits amounts of players isn't such a big deal.