Big Pete
International Captain
- Mar 12, 2008
- 32,095
- 25,698
- Thread starter
- #19
Judging by recent media reports, it sounds as if the Broncos had a change of heart and weren't going to name Hunt at all.
However, I was led to believe the only reason why Hunt was able to get away with that in the first place was that it was a low-range offence and he was only facing a week on the sideline. Sims is facing five weeks which supposedly made him ineligible.
So I'm not sure what the case is. Whether the 9s exist inside their own vacuum, whether Wayne wants to treat the WCC game as an opportunity to test out alternatives to Hunt or if the five week rule was bogus.
We'll find out shortly.
However, I was led to believe the only reason why Hunt was able to get away with that in the first place was that it was a low-range offence and he was only facing a week on the sideline. Sims is facing five weeks which supposedly made him ineligible.
So I'm not sure what the case is. Whether the 9s exist inside their own vacuum, whether Wayne wants to treat the WCC game as an opportunity to test out alternatives to Hunt or if the five week rule was bogus.
We'll find out shortly.