CRICKET BBL|12

[broncos4life]

I love Neser. On another note I don’t know if it is the freakishly long neck but I can’t stand Silk.

 

[Allo]

Neser is just the best

(lmao at that rule though)

 

[Sproj]

18 off 6, you could argue the Sixers have been robbed here and it should be 12 off 6. Regardless, still have the feeling the Heat will lose this.

 

[Sproj]

Time for useless bloke to prove he isn't useless.

 

[Sproj]

Useless bloke takes a wicket!

 

[BroncosFever]

They're going to have to change that rule, it should never be out and I am a Heat fan

 

[Sproj]

17 off 3...can they actually do it?

 

[Sproj]

They're going to have to change that rule, it should never be out and I am a Heat fan

100% agree.

 

[broncos4life]

Whitely to win it. Sounds weird.

 

[Sproj]

Useless bloke has actually bowled a really good over, credit where it is due.

 

[BroncosFever]

Useless bloke has actually bowled a really good over, credit where it is due.

He bowls 120km/h straight ones, I don't think he's added anything to our team

 

[Sproj]

Still, to make 224 and win only by 15 with a HUGE amount of luck on a weird call, very concerning.

 

[BroncosFever]

If they don't change that rule it's going to be exploited far more than it was there

 

[broncos4life]

I don’t get all the outrage over the catch, it is literally the rule. No-one is robbed when the rule book clearly says that is a catch.

 

[Locky24]

Steketee is so shit, he’s the next one that needs to be dropped. Bring Bartlett back in

 

[Sproj]

I don’t get all the outrage over the catch, it is literally the rule. No-one is robbed when the rule book clearly says that is a catch.

Sure but no one has done it before, so kudos to Neser. Doesn't change the fact that is not in the spirit of the rule.

 

[broncos4life]

If they don't change that rule it's going to be exploited far more than it was there

No it’s not. To ‘exploit’ it you have to have both a huge amount of luck and skill which is the reason we haven’t seen it before. Most times the player wouldn’t get both feet off the ground before throwing it back in so it is a non issue. You can’t change rules because something looks weird.

 

[broncos4life]

Sure but no one has done it before, so kudos to Neser. Doesn't change the fact that is not in the spirit of the rule.

Not in the spirit of the rule? Did you hear them read it out? It is literally the rule. They put the provision in there about as long as the player isn’t grounded for that reason. It’s fine to not like the rule but that doesn’t make it not in the spirit.