1
1910
International Rep
- Apr 14, 2013
- 15,875
- 20,081
Did you even watch it. He ran away from the ball, in what world is that an obstruction.
Plus Bailey can get fucked for appealing for it.
Based on this precedent, I hope any change of line McCullum appeals for obstruction
Running away from the ball has nothing to do with it, if I hit the ball back to the bowler and took a single, the non striker would be running away from the ball but he still can't zig zag down the pitch blocking the stumps.
The rule says wilful. Did he wilfully change direction to stop the fielder hitting the stumps.