It's interesting you single out Newscorp for dishonesty.
If you want to tear apart journalist sloppiness, the centre left media has very little concern for accuracy if they can slip in a political jab. Take this example I read this morning, in the SMH masquerading as science. It buries some thoroughly incoherent thoughts based around a couple of preprints about who might more susceptible to covid in this lede about an ex president, who has nothing whatsover to do with the story:
"Until a week ago, when my family and I dropped like flies, I thought I might just be one of *those* people: the unicorns referred to as “never COVID people”, who test negative despite having been exposed to the virus. Are these people paragons of health? Have they been listening to Trump and other Ivermectin-promoting types and been taking their daily dose of horse wormer?"
Did Trump ever spruik Ivermectin? Of course not. He founded the Warp Speed project that accelerated the rollout of Messenger RNA vaccines, and he, himself, took Monoclonal Antibodies as a treatment. As for Ivermectin being a "horse wormer." No, it's also comes in human dosages. But "horse wormer" works better for ridicule, and this side of politics sneers down at the other side for being dumb. It's their thing.
But no one cares about partisan historical revisionism when the picture you're painting is the one you'd prefer to hang on your wall.
Now I'm not defending Newcorp as a bastion of truth. Good luck finding that in any media. But don't kid yourself Fairfax is any better. In my observation it's worse across the board.
Are COVID-resistant people healthier, luckier or is it in their genes? New research provides the clues.
www.smh.com.au