Exactly.
If you decide, as the Broncos have, to go down the development club pathway there are many pros and cons to deal with.
All players in our system must have shown some promise or they wouldn’t be.
Firstly, those young fellas, generally on above average money, need to resist the temptations of their generation and keep their mind on the job at hand. If they succeed and pop out the other end at 18 or 19yrs old the club has to choose who to keep and who to release. Seems to me, more often then not we either make the wrong decision or the vultures come and take that decision out of our hands by offering overs. Ash Taylor and Ben Hunt come to mind. Even then one appears to have worked out the other not so much. It really is a case of supply and demand. When one of your gun players retires he needs to be replaced by a suitably experienced developed player or a buy in. If neither happens it creates a void, a gap, and if a number of players are involved, the gap widens and all of a sudden your talking about a club rebuilding. Our young team is not yet suitably experienced and unless these so called “good signings” are the players required at the minute we still have some waiting to do.
It’s no coincidence that both top of the ladder teams and last year grand finalists are not development clubs but in fact vultures.
If the NRL continues to ignore our effort in developing players perhaps we would be better off dropping it and become a vulture club too.