C
Coxy
International Captain
- Mar 4, 2008
- 31,212
- 1,886
On a scale of 1 to 10 of alcohol related incidents this is around a 0. But repeat offences would make it worse.
Coxy said:On a scale of 1 to 10 of alcohol related incidents this is around a 0. But repeat offences would make it worse.
Coxy said:On a scale of 1 to 10 of alcohol related incidents this is around a 0. But repeat offences would make it worse.
user_nat said:They should be getting some guidance after the first incident. Who knows what trouble they might get into next time.
Bucking Beads said:Coxy said:On a scale of 1 to 10 of alcohol related incidents this is around a 0. But repeat offences would make it worse.
no doubt, but with such a young squad we must bring down the hammer otherwise it could get out of hand... I have heard of plenty of times Macca is out and about on the piss.
Jeba said:Bucking Beads said:Coxy said:On a scale of 1 to 10 of alcohol related incidents this is around a 0. But repeat offences would make it worse.
no doubt, but with such a young squad we must bring down the hammer otherwise it could get out of hand... I have heard of plenty of times Macca is out and about on the piss.
I've seen him out on the piss a few times too, but fair dinkum are some people in this thread suggesting he should be punished for that??? Seriously?? He hasnt been arrested for anything before this. Whether or not it's because he's been lucky enough not to have been caught playing up will remain a question which is why this current punishment is sufficient and hopefully he treats it as a wake-up call as a few have said.
Jeba said:Bucking Beads said:Coxy said:On a scale of 1 to 10 of alcohol related incidents this is around a 0. But repeat offences would make it worse.
no doubt, but with such a young squad we must bring down the hammer otherwise it could get out of hand... I have heard of plenty of times Macca is out and about on the piss.
I've seen him out on the piss a few times too, but fair dinkum are some people in this thread suggesting he should be punished for that??? Seriously?? He hasnt been arrested for anything before this. Whether or not it's because he's been lucky enough not to have been caught playing up will remain a question which is why this current punishment is sufficient and hopefully he treats it as a wake-up call as a few have said.
Donny said:Were they actually arrested? The Courier mail says that they were charged. To be charged you have to be arrested. They must have done something a little more then just trying to get into a pub after being told to leave another pub. If that is all they did then its pretty poor that they were arrested. Any normal person and by normal i mean not a nrl/afl/rugby player would have been told to piss off.
Um no.Kaz said:Donny said:Were they actually arrested? The Courier mail says that they were charged. To be charged you have to be arrested. They must have done something a little more then just trying to get into a pub after being told to leave another pub. If that is all they did then its pretty poor that they were arrested. Any normal person and by normal i mean not a nrl/afl/rugby player would have been told to piss off.
Maybe the cop wanted a medal for charging/arresting a public profile. (A feather in his cap)
Cop: ZOMG: I charged/arrested footy players