B
big k
QCup Player
- Apr 10, 2013
- 819
- 1,124
Manu and Lodge have the same charge and the same grade 1, yet Lodge gets a week and Manu a fine?
both were charged with grade 1 - careless high tackle.
yet Manu's had a base penalty of $1500, while Lodge's had a base penalty of 100 points.
how the **** can that be when they're the same charge
the other thing to note is that Manu only got charged for 1 of his 2 identical tackles he made within a couple of minutes
NSWRL.both were charged with grade 1 - careless high tackle.
yet Manu's had a base penalty of $1500, while Lodge's had a base penalty of 100 points.
how the **** can that be when they're the same charge
The way I read it was for some strange reason if Radley challenged it and won his sentence was reduced but if he lost for some strange reason his sentence stayed the same? How that only applies to him is beyond me and of course because he is not risking any further suspension why wouldn’t he challenge it. It just all sounds so bent.Radleys challenging his so he can get one week instead of four, that’ll do me. He should’ve been sent off.
It just all sounds so bent.
The way I read it was for some strange reason if Radley challenged it and won his sentence was reduced but if he lost for some strange reason his sentence stayed the same? How that only applies to him is beyond me and of course because he is not risking any further suspension why wouldn’t he challenge it. It just all sounds so bent.
I thought it would be the opposite... where he doesn't make a single putt and then his bank account is suddenly reduced from bets, but it doesnt matter because you just cheat code up to $2 billion to startgood game that one.....playing as Nick, you didnt miss a single putt...!
You know he'll get off, that'll free him up to be named for NSW.Radleys challenging his so he can get one week instead of four, that’ll do me. He should’ve been sent off.