Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Exactly in fact it's already happened, which is why it was brought to a head. Have a look which way the penalty goes initially when he fly kicks klemmer in the head
Neither Socnorb or I claimed that that was okay.
You guys are arguing it is ok though because otherwise how else would he defend himself from someone rushing in to snap him in half when he hits the turf?Neither Socnorb or I claimed that that was okay.
But the striking is inevitable when you have guys trying to tackle the player when they touch the ground or if they want to compete for the ball.No, I argue that the positioning is okay, not the striking.
My cousin plays U18s at WestsSorry Soup, She plays in the ruck for the Mighty West Magpies AFL
This is feeling like a circular argument. I mentioned a certain ex-BHQer last night who is synonymous with this. We may need an exorcist.
No idea what you're talking about but my very first point (on page 6) was about how it prevents players contesting the ballOnly if they are too close while he is in the air. But like @Foordy said earlier, my argument is broken if they are attacking the ball rather than the player.
No way, that's amazing. I think they're in the senior club we're obviously juniors til u17.My cousin plays U18s at Wests
If its illegal, why isn't he penalised?
They may however, wish to contest the bomb.That said, the argument that any player getting hit steaming in, would be making a legal tackle, is absolute bullshit, because there is no way Slater is back on the ground before being hit, which would make the tackle not only illegal, but very dangerous.
Has anyone got any information on why we haven't resigned Boyd our current captain and so called leader of the team?
Has anyone got any information on why we haven't resigned Boyd our current captain and so called leader of the team?