draggx said:01. Norman
02. Winterstein
03. Glenn
04. Te'o
05. Copley
06. Lockyer
07. Hunt
08. Kenny
09. McCullough
10. Anderson
11. Sims
12. Thaiday
13. Gillette
14. Wallace
15. McGuire
16. Setu
17. Hala
lyn said:draggx said:01. Norman
02. Winterstein
03. Glenn
04. Te'o
05. Copley
06. Lockyer
07. Hunt
08. Kenny
09. McCullough
10. Anderson
11. Sims
12. Thaiday
13. Gillette
14. Wallace
15. McGuire
16. Setu
17. Hala
Really? What is your plan with Wallace from the bench?
Big Pete said:That and also Copley isn't up to starting centre...yet.
draggx said:lyn said:draggx said:01. Norman
02. Winterstein
03. Glenn
04. Te'o
05. Copley
06. Lockyer
07. Hunt
08. Kenny
09. McCullough
10. Anderson
11. Sims
12. Thaiday
13. Gillette
14. Wallace
15. McGuire
16. Setu
17. Hala
Really? What is your plan with Wallace from the bench?
Wallace could add some flair to the Hooker position when Macca is rested and Hunt will be a very solid Half who can go the distance.
I know i have said the game only really needs the 1 Hooker per side. But right now we are running out of puff towards the end of each half and Locky is looking worse each week (Injury is coming). A fresh Wallace coming on either side of half time would be a nice boost.
I would even consider Sims on the bench as well and at the 20minute mark bring Sims and Wallace on together.
As for Locky he has to play the whole 80 for sure but im really worried his gonna get injured soon he just does not look fit and Hunt playing a full 80 will make sure we have it covered in the future experience wise.
ddd said:draggz has mad love for Hunt - but if he really loved him, he wouldn't want to send him out in this game where we're gonna get pantsed
#1 Kemp fan said:ddd said:draggz has mad love for Hunt - but if he really loved him, he wouldn't want to send him out in this game where we're gonna get pantsed
He must be a friend of his on facebook!! [icon_lol1.
joshobro said:I think Lockyer and Wallace have to step up, what they're doing isn't enough. Yeah we might not have hodges or folau but still he is supposed to be one of the best players in the comp, he is close to the most experienced and what Lockyer is doing at the moment isn't good enough. He needs to forget about all the rep shit and just focus on the broncos. On current form you wouldn't pick Lockyer at all. Norman to me looks like he could be good but is not up to first grade at the moment, I would pick Hoffman cos every time he has played nrl he has looked the goods. As for defence yeah ours sucks at the moment, but it is also hard to get defensive patterns set when there is someone different defending there every week. I think a big weakness of ours is our bench, it doesn't offer any spark at all. We really could have used Tim Smith, I think it was a big mistake letting him go to the sharks. Whatever happens I think we are going to be in a world of shit against the dragons, they are playing well and I think especially on that left side with Cooper and Morris they are going to have a field day with out defence! We are so low on experience that I don't think bringing up young blokes who deserve a shot like Hala is a good idea, we need some sort of experience but who knows where we can get it from. Hopefully Tronc signs on so we can rush him into the side, that way you could probably push Anderson back into the backrow and Sims back on the bench. Although Sims tends to fire up every time he plays the dragons so maybe it would be good to keep him starting. Henjaks use of the interchange has been shocking, I reckon we lucked out with him as coach. He is an average assistant coach at best and a terrible first grade coach. Not looking forward to watching the dragons game at all it could end up being a blood bath!!
lockyer47 said:rnabokov said:We won it last year because we were right up in their face, and on Soward's face, and we played as a disciplined, well organised team and stuck to a well thought out game plan.
Henjak, Lockyer and Wallace. That's their task.
Come on, look at the difference in the teams.
Our team might come up with the same attitude and game plan but we just don't have the personnel to pull it off - and that is just being frank.
For us to win it would seriously mean the Dragons shoot themselves in the foot? Highly, highly unlikely.
We're having a go but our defense is terrible and that is being nice.
ddd said:#1 Kemp fan said:ddd said:draggz has mad love for Hunt - but if he really loved him, he wouldn't want to send him out in this game where we're gonna get pantsed
He must be a friend of his on facebook!! [icon_lol1.
Harsh! C'mon, you'd add Hunt if he friend requested you
(I have not)