Foordy
International Captain
Contributor
- Mar 4, 2008
- 34,727
- 41,389
that was pretty poor bowling from Nortje
They really don’t. I think they were spot on with making it a bowler friendly pitch game 1 of the series to not allow SA batsmen into any form of confidence so the explaining falls completely on the ground staff at the GABBA who took bowling friendly to a new interpretation. You also have to remember the Gabba staff don’t bowl 130+ clicks they can’t go testing how the pitch is playing they can only do there simple tests and by that point there’s not much you can do anyway. Shit happens.CA have some fucking explaining to do regarding that pitch.
I just watched another replay of the Van Der Dussen dismissal, ok that batting technique is rubbish but goodness me, how good was that ball. It wobbled the whole way down and then nipped back off the seam. Absolute peach to bring up 300.
I was thinking last year the boxing day test finished in 2 days 1 session.... and like first thing in the morning, but the only reason it lasted so long was because Australia were able to bat for 87 overs.... but that was also completely dominated by the ball. But because it's the precious MCG it's all fineIt's all a bit much- was it wet at the start- yep, did it favour bowlers- yep, do you want all of them like that-no but if Australia had batted first and got 4/600 no one would have said a thing and we get those pitches all the time.
Every pitch should be different, when Sydney would break up and turn and part-time spinners take 12 wickets no one said how unfair it was- we celebrated the difference.
That's the skill of cricket, you have to bat well in all conditions on all surfaces. It wasn't dangerous I don't think anyone was hit in the head and Head proved you can get runs and both teams had a chance to win the game.
It's all a bit much- ..................