Kooly87
NRL Captain
- Jun 2, 2017
- 4,197
- 7,275
I'm certainly not in the camp of relying on Milford, far from it. I do agree though that on paper at least in a previous life he's been capable of being a regular match winner before and he might still be the best (but very slim) hope that Kev has at his disposal, because outside of that I don't see much.Not really sure what point you’re trying to prove. @Mr Fourex claimed Milford was the only player who could be a potential game breaker, it wasn’t true. Therefore the argument is over. Positions don’t matter. If the law of averages favour a centre over our million dollar half, especially recently, then I’d say that’s pretty fucked
I am done with relying on Milford for anything. I don’t expect him to do shit. The entire game plan for two years was pass it to Haas or Fifita while Milford hid. Milford hasn’t been reliable for anything since like 2018 and even then wasn’t good enough and showed what kind of player he was. And before anyone brings up his player of the year award, he only won it because they couldn’t give it to Lodge. There’s no more excuses, he steps up and does his job or he can take the millions he’s earned and **** off elsewhere.
Milford had potential to be one of the greats, now he could potentially never recover.
Staggs and the others you mentioned have won games for us before, but no player who plays a position where they touch the ball a handful of times a game in the opposition half is going to win you games on a regular basis (and nor should we expect them to), so I don't see them belonging in the conversation about consistent and reliable match winners.
Last edited: