Kaz
State of Origin Captain
- Mar 5, 2008
- 10,017
- 3,761
Alec
International Rep
- Mar 4, 2008
- 19,400
- 12,528
Does this mean Lockyer is happy to stay as well?
T
The Brizz
Deactivated
- Mar 4, 2008
- 6,206
- 19
He is the captain. Like the CEO he has to come out and say this is a master stroke even though they missed the guy they wanted. They wouldn't be doing there jobs if they didn't come out with stuff like this. These comments have no impact on Lockyer's future.
A
ALH
QCup Player
- Mar 7, 2008
- 344
- 0
FCB BB AKA MB said:
Spot on again - totally agree.
Nashy
Immortal
Senior Staff
- Mar 5, 2008
- 54,409
- 34,687
Who cares if they didn't get Bellamy. Why are people going on about it as if Bruno should be shot.
Foordy
International Captain
Contributor
- Mar 4, 2008
- 34,743
- 41,409
Nashy said:
I gotta say i'm alot happierthat Hanjak will be the coach next year than i would have been if Bellamy was appointed
Nashy
Immortal
Senior Staff
- Mar 5, 2008
- 54,409
- 34,687
^ Exactly!
I'm just glad we didn't get some no name.
I'm just glad we didn't get some no name.
6
666
QCup Player
- Mar 5, 2008
- 294
- 0
ALH said:
you both have no idea so it's no wonder you agree with each other
T
The Brizz
Deactivated
- Mar 4, 2008
- 6,206
- 19
666 said:
No idea? How so because I have an opinion that the CEO is going to endorse the choice the club has made for the new coach regardless of the fact it isn't the man he really wanted? Bruno wanted Bellamy didn't get him and quickly sured up his back up option which is great because I think Henjak has talent. He helped make the decision ultimately to hire Henjak so why would he come out and say anything different. Also why would the captain say anything other than support for Henjak? He is the captain he isn't going to come out and say "Bruno got it wrong now I am going to piss off to England" he is going to tow the club line regardless, what I was saying regardless of what Lockyer's actual opinion is he is too diplomatic and as a captain he is too smart to air it one way or the other. He will always come out with the generic "the boys support the boards decision etc". Thats how it works. You don't make a big decision in a business (which is essentially what the club is) without coming out and saying you are excited/happy with the result.
6
666
QCup Player
- Mar 5, 2008
- 294
- 0
FCB BB AKA MB said:
No idea? How so because I have an opinion that the CEO is going to endorse the choice the club has made for the new coach regardless of the fact it isn't the man he really wanted? Bruno wanted Bellamy didn't get him and quickly sured up his back up option which is great because I think Henjak has talent. He helped make the decision ultimately to hire Henjak so why would he come out and say anything different. Also why would the captain say anything other than support for Henjak? He is the captain he isn't going to come out and say "Bruno got it wrong now I am going to piss off to England" he is going to tow the club line regardless, what I was saying regardless of what Lockyer's actual opinion is he is too diplomatic and as a captain he is too smart to air it one way or the other. He will always come out with the generic "the boys support the boards decision etc". Thats how it works. You don't make a big decision in a business (which is essentially what the club is) without coming out and saying you are excited/happy with the result.[/quote:1euoedqm]
they may not have got bellamy, but that doesn't mean they aren't happy with Henjak. Plus how do you know Lockyer and the rest of the players aren't happy with Henjak. It may be the stock standard thing to say, but that doesn't make it BS.
Like i've said the players were consulted on the new coach. It's a fairly safe bet they are happy with the new coach
A
ALH
QCup Player
- Mar 7, 2008
- 344
- 0
FCB BB AKA MB said:
No idea? How so because I have an opinion that the CEO is going to endorse the choice the club has made for the new coach regardless of the fact it isn't the man he really wanted? Bruno wanted Bellamy didn't get him and quickly sured up his back up option which is great because I think Henjak has talent. He helped make the decision ultimately to hire Henjak so why would he come out and say anything different. Also why would the captain say anything other than support for Henjak? He is the captain he isn't going to come out and say "Bruno got it wrong now I am going to piss off to England" he is going to tow the club line regardless, what I was saying regardless of what Lockyer's actual opinion is he is too diplomatic and as a captain he is too smart to air it one way or the other. He will always come out with the generic "the boys support the boards decision etc". Thats how it works. You don't make a big decision in a business (which is essentially what the club is) without coming out and saying you are excited/happy with the result.[/quote:k8euq6gh]
Well said and I agree with you AGAIN.
666 you have no idea!
6
666
QCup Player
- Mar 5, 2008
- 294
- 0
ALH said:
Well said and I agree with you AGAIN.
666 you have no idea![/quote:3haifjy3]
of course you agree, chances are you're the same person
A
ALH
QCup Player
- Mar 7, 2008
- 344
- 0
666 said:
of course you agree, chances are you're the same person[/quote:1yw2tdye]
You should just read what was written and if you don't agree, write something constructive or just MOVE ON!
FCB took the time to explain his reasons and your reply was pointless!
6
666
QCup Player
- Mar 5, 2008
- 294
- 0
ALH said:
I wrote a decent reply, didn't need to write a novel, so far you've added nothing to the debate other than to stick your nose as far up FCB BB AKA MB as you can.
A
ALH
QCup Player
- Mar 7, 2008
- 344
- 0
666 said:
I didn't want to waste my time with you, but given your inability to construct a decent point of view.
6
666
QCup Player
- Mar 5, 2008
- 294
- 0
ALH said:
what so when I typed the following
they may not have got bellamy, but that doesn't mean they aren't happy with Henjak. Plus how do you know Lockyer and the rest of the players aren't happy with Henjak. It may be the stock standard thing to say, but that doesn't make it BS.
Like i've said the players were consulted on the new coach. It's a fairly safe bet they are happy with the new coach
it wasn't a decent point of view?
And in the coaches topic to a similar statement by your bum chum I made the point that we signed Folau with NO COACH, retained Parker with NO COACH
What did you want a novel?
GCBRONCO
International Captain
- Mar 4, 2008
- 22,246
- 20,573
I think its pretty naive of people to think clubs would limit a successful appointment of a coach to just one target, if you put all your hopes on one accepting the position your not only setting yourself up for a great more deal of disappointment if it doesn't happen but your neglecting your duties and only making the job harder on yourself, you always got to be open to other choices.
Also I think 666 has a point too, the players can still very much be happy with the appointment of Henjak regardless and Lockyer could very well mean it as while his not going to come out and bag the appointment, he doesn't have to praise it either.
Also I think 666 has a point too, the players can still very much be happy with the appointment of Henjak regardless and Lockyer could very well mean it as while his not going to come out and bag the appointment, he doesn't have to praise it either.
Professor47
NRL Player
- Mar 5, 2008
- 1,632
- 81
I have to admit, I'm leaning towards more of a generic/stock answer, but there could and probably is certain elements of truth behind it. Im pretty sure they would have all wanted Bellamy, but Henjak probably does have the support of the players also. I must say Locky does give way too much general answers all the time, from what I've heard he cracks a few jokes and all that , but doesn't show any of it to the media, learn his trade form WB I daresay. good stuff.
