Marquee Players
- Thread starter Mister Wright
- Start date
broncos4life
International Captain
- Oct 5, 2011
- 26,725
- 27,407
Re: [RUMOUR] Barba to Broncos
Well it is ludicrous because some clubs can't afford to spend the full salary cap as it currently is. So to essentially raise it by another million will mean that some clubs have a fair better roster than others are capable of. For what it's worth I hate the salary cap, all I'm saying is if they are going to bring this in the might as well just scrap the cap
Well it is ludicrous because some clubs can't afford to spend the full salary cap as it currently is. So to essentially raise it by another million will mean that some clubs have a fair better roster than others are capable of. For what it's worth I hate the salary cap, all I'm saying is if they are going to bring this in the might as well just scrap the cap
- Mar 5, 2008
- 55,462
- 36,136
Re: [RUMOUR] Barba to Broncos
So all clubs should suffer because some deadshit ex footballers can't run a business?
Where are these protections in the real world? If the company you work for is not run correctly, and they can't make money, they either get rid of staff, or go bankrupt. It should be no different.
So all clubs should suffer because some deadshit ex footballers can't run a business?
Where are these protections in the real world? If the company you work for is not run correctly, and they can't make money, they either get rid of staff, or go bankrupt. It should be no different.
88to2006Glorydays
NYC Player
- Jul 9, 2013
- 175
- 45
Re: [RUMOUR] Barba to Broncos
Spot on Nashy
Spot on Nashy
broncos4life
International Captain
- Oct 5, 2011
- 26,725
- 27,407
Re: [RUMOUR] Barba to Broncos
Eh that's not even close to my point. All I was saying is it seems pointless to have this marquee allowance when it just make the salary cap higher and not all clubs can reach it.
As I said before, I don't like the salary cap and think it should be scraped, I just also think this marquee allowance is a load of shit. Take the bulldogs for example, if they wanted folau they would have to shed a barba or Morris... Not anymore, they an use that marquee allowance to make folau the folau the highest paid winger in the game.
Eh that's not even close to my point. All I was saying is it seems pointless to have this marquee allowance when it just make the salary cap higher and not all clubs can reach it.
As I said before, I don't like the salary cap and think it should be scraped, I just also think this marquee allowance is a load of shit. Take the bulldogs for example, if they wanted folau they would have to shed a barba or Morris... Not anymore, they an use that marquee allowance to make folau the folau the highest paid winger in the game.
- Mar 13, 2008
- 6,522
- 2,807
Re: [RUMOUR] Barba to Broncos
That's the whole point of the marquee allowance though. It prevents teams from paying 1mil to every elite player, but allows every team to do it for one player, enabling the NRL to keep players like Folau in the NRL rather than in a rival code.
That's the whole point of the marquee allowance though. It prevents teams from paying 1mil to every elite player, but allows every team to do it for one player, enabling the NRL to keep players like Folau in the NRL rather than in a rival code.
- Mar 5, 2008
- 55,462
- 36,136
Re: [RUMOUR] Barba to Broncos
So what? They shouldn't be able to spend their money, earned from good business decisions, on a player which can only increase their brand?
So what? They shouldn't be able to spend their money, earned from good business decisions, on a player which can only increase their brand?
broncos4life
International Captain
- Oct 5, 2011
- 26,725
- 27,407
Re: [RUMOUR] Barba to Broncos
**** me. Yes of course they should be able to, that's why I hate the salary cap. My point is, if you bought this in today there would be clubs that can't afford to pay that money.
So if club x can afford to pay there players 6 million, but club y can only afford to pay 4 million, then that's defeating the whole purpose of the salary cap. Hence my point that if they bring this in they should just get rid of the salary cap
**** me. Yes of course they should be able to, that's why I hate the salary cap. My point is, if you bought this in today there would be clubs that can't afford to pay that money.
So if club x can afford to pay there players 6 million, but club y can only afford to pay 4 million, then that's defeating the whole purpose of the salary cap. Hence my point that if they bring this in they should just get rid of the salary cap
- Mar 5, 2008
- 55,462
- 36,136
Re: [RUMOUR] Barba to Broncos
It's not defeating the whole purpose of it at all. It's still limiting what those cashed up clubs can do with their money.
It's not defeating the whole purpose of it at all. It's still limiting what those cashed up clubs can do with their money.
vertigo
State of Origin Rep
- Mar 2, 2010
- 6,333
- 4,456
Re: [RUMOUR] Barba to Broncos
Scrapping the cap is a real can of worms.
You'd end up seeing the same top clubs every year (albeit with great quality footy) and having a few fold in the process due to not being able to attract or hold onto talent.
And no that isn't a good thing, less teams means less games which means less money from TV rights deals.
Scrapping the cap is a real can of worms.
You'd end up seeing the same top clubs every year (albeit with great quality footy) and having a few fold in the process due to not being able to attract or hold onto talent.
And no that isn't a good thing, less teams means less games which means less money from TV rights deals.
- Mar 5, 2008
- 55,462
- 36,136
Re: [RUMOUR] Barba to Broncos
No, no cap means teams will have to become good at being a business, something that many of the poor Sydney clubs can't do. It will mean new teams in new areas, and less useless teams being propped up by the NRL.
No, no cap means teams will have to become good at being a business, something that many of the poor Sydney clubs can't do. It will mean new teams in new areas, and less useless teams being propped up by the NRL.
- Jan 25, 2013
- 25,774
- 30,199
IMO, even the poorer clubs could make a marquee player allowance work. The marquee player should be part of their marketing strategies and potentially should bring in added sponsorship dollars. Just as important as, say, $1 mill being cap exempt, should be unlimited guaranteed 3rd party deals. Whore the player out to anyone willing to stump up the cash and it'd pay for itself.
Splinter
NRL Player
- Feb 16, 2013
- 2,818
- 989
Re: [RUMOUR] Barba to Broncos
Why can't teams spend their cap money. My understanding is that the cap money is given to the clubs by the league. Certainly in the past.
Now I am under the assumption someone like Cronulla will get the full cap given to them but Broncos and Roosters would get only a percentage because they have more money. It is of no advantage for a club to be profitable from now on as I understand it so everyone should be able to spend right up to the cap. It is like the Labor party have taken over running of the NRL
Why can't teams spend their cap money. My understanding is that the cap money is given to the clubs by the league. Certainly in the past.
Now I am under the assumption someone like Cronulla will get the full cap given to them but Broncos and Roosters would get only a percentage because they have more money. It is of no advantage for a club to be profitable from now on as I understand it so everyone should be able to spend right up to the cap. It is like the Labor party have taken over running of the NRL
- Mar 4, 2008
- 10,566
- 5,415
Re: [RUMOUR] Barba to Broncos
Nashy is dominating this thread atm.
Nashy is dominating this thread atm.
- Jan 25, 2013
- 25,774
- 30,199
They all get the same money from the NRL. In the past there was a gap between the cap and the grants given to clubs, but that's now closed and covered. It's the other expenses, the day-to-day running, the coaching staff, the facilities, that teams have to pay for themselves, and that's where the discrepancies between the rich & poor clubs lie.
But yeah, if the NRL fronts up whatever the marquee allowance is, and they should because keeping the stars in the game is really a benefit to the NRL itself, then really clubs aren't paying any more than they are now.
- Mar 13, 2008
- 6,522
- 2,807
Re: [RUMOUR] Barba to Broncos
There are some dangers though. Yes some areas would support a team (Perth, Wellington) but what if more than 2 clubs fold? Maybe Sunshine Coast and Central Coast could support a team, but it wouldn't be a powerhouse team. Also, allowing for unlimited spending has a real potential for failure with private backers who go bankrupt. You see this happen a lot in Football (Soccer) and you only have to look at the Knights and Tinkler to see the potential danger. Imagine if he went belly up after backing the Knights with no salary cap!
There are some dangers though. Yes some areas would support a team (Perth, Wellington) but what if more than 2 clubs fold? Maybe Sunshine Coast and Central Coast could support a team, but it wouldn't be a powerhouse team. Also, allowing for unlimited spending has a real potential for failure with private backers who go bankrupt. You see this happen a lot in Football (Soccer) and you only have to look at the Knights and Tinkler to see the potential danger. Imagine if he went belly up after backing the Knights with no salary cap!
