NEWS Milford Discussion Thread
- Thread starter Santa
- Start date
BooKhaki
NRL Player
- Sep 16, 2020
- 2,992
- 3,948
Yes. It informs us that Milford won't be back in the NRL for a while if he assaulted some females, and will be a fat mess when he returns.
Is todays soup menstrual blood flavoured?
- Mar 4, 2008
- 34,835
- 41,606
well, if he's representing Milford in NRL proceedings ... then Milford is fucked
BooKhaki
NRL Player
- Sep 16, 2020
- 2,992
- 3,948
Your post got the response it deserved.
ozzball
QCup Player
- Mar 17, 2013
- 321
- 683
Been a member on here for a while mate, read a lot but don't say much unless I have something to say ... that BooKhaki character is the first dude I've "ignored" in all that time. Don't need to read that kinda nonsense.
I bleed Maroon
International Rep
- Apr 17, 2013
- 15,893
- 20,766
If that's the best he can do after being on 1 million a year for 4 years, then he truly is fucked. Souths will tear up his deal and he will be Super League bound.
He will win a man of steel in super league.. Do you reckon Milford would go any good in union?
I'm unsure how their rules are regarding players banned elsewhere (if worse case scenario happens) but it could be another option for him.
I bleed Maroon
International Rep
- Apr 17, 2013
- 15,893
- 20,766
Dawdling around the back of the scrum not doing much whilst they roll around and jump all over each other for literal minutes waiting for the ball to somehow pop out the rear like a duck egg....Yeah that sounds like Milf's wheelhouse.
- Apr 26, 2008
- 34,578
- 35,550
Is there any source at all saying he allegedly assaulted 2 females or are you just speculating?
BooKhaki
NRL Player
- Sep 16, 2020
- 2,992
- 3,948
You just got triggered and had a little outburst. It's ok, happens to the most average of us.So did yours obviously.
- Mar 4, 2008
- 34,835
- 41,606
yeah fox sports say it was 2 females and a male that intervened in his argument and were assaulted
Milford allegedly assaulted two women, Broncos face $100k contract call as new details emerge
Milford allegedly assaulted two women as Broncos face $100k contract decision
www.foxsports.com.au
BooKhaki
NRL Player
- Sep 16, 2020
- 2,992
- 3,948
BooKhaki
NRL Player
- Sep 16, 2020
- 2,992
- 3,948
Were you there? Do you have any news for us?
No?
OK, I'll comment on what's being reported and the police statements saying what he has been charged with.
BroncosFever
State of Origin Rep
- Jun 6, 2014
- 6,129
- 10,933
If he's guilty of what is being reported, the club would be stupid to not sack him
He's literally on leave until his contract expires in 6 weeks
He's literally on leave until his contract expires in 6 weeks
- Aug 25, 2018
- 17,984
- 31,047
Let's wait for some more details on the nature of these "assaults" before we string up the rope.yeah fox sports say it was 2 females and a male that intervened in his argument and were assaulted
Milford allegedly assaulted two women, Broncos face $100k contract call as new details emerge
Milford allegedly assaulted two women as Broncos face $100k contract decision
What's your take on this
Jason Simmons ?
- Jul 28, 2016
- 23,658
- 34,793
Is this likely to end up being a "no fault stand down" type of situation?
Milf isn't in court until October (I believe?) and you'd think he'll be pleading not guilty (pending the possible sentence for the crime and impact on his career), so it could end up dragging out if it goes to court.
I think it's a bit risky to sack him prior to a guilty verdict, due to the perception and precedent it sets. It could also be met with legal action from Milf if he's eventually found not guilty.
I cant quite recall the timeline, but how did the Barba sacking from cowboys play out??
I think they may have sacked him based on findings from the integrity unit investigation or did he plead guilty straight away?
If we were to sack him before his court appearance or before the integrity unit are finished then it could become an unwanted precedent and would likely be done just to save a few bucks.
Do we want Milf's contract off the books? Yes
Do we want to set a precedent to sack every player that is charged (prior to a guilty verdict)? Not necessarily
Milf isn't in court until October (I believe?) and you'd think he'll be pleading not guilty (pending the possible sentence for the crime and impact on his career), so it could end up dragging out if it goes to court.
I think it's a bit risky to sack him prior to a guilty verdict, due to the perception and precedent it sets. It could also be met with legal action from Milf if he's eventually found not guilty.
I cant quite recall the timeline, but how did the Barba sacking from cowboys play out??
I think they may have sacked him based on findings from the integrity unit investigation or did he plead guilty straight away?
If we were to sack him before his court appearance or before the integrity unit are finished then it could become an unwanted precedent and would likely be done just to save a few bucks.
Do we want Milf's contract off the books? Yes
Do we want to set a precedent to sack every player that is charged (prior to a guilty verdict)? Not necessarily
Only going off news reports I've seen so no hard evidence but pretty sure the damage was a bin into a car or something so there might be evidence he is guilty of that and if its happened in the valley high possibility it could be on CCTV. I'm sure the broncos would have alot more details so they wouldn't sack him if there is a chance he's not guilty
