Mitchell Pearce suspended for 8 weeks

[ivanhungryjak]

She gave as good as she got. She came across as a lying,manipulative so and so who was after money and didn't care about ruining his life to get it. I'm rather glad the judge saw her for what she was.

Rubbish. Did you read the texts? Some of the stuff he wrote was pathetic.

 

[tommy]

Rubbish. Did you read the texts? Some of the stuff he wrote was pathetic.

Only what was reported on. Reading other people's texts doesn't interest me that much. They both called each other vile names I know that much. Why were his so bad and hers not?

 

[tommy]

[h=2]Ms Peris warned about adding commentary to answers[/h]Ms Peris faced hours of cross-examination, including over her motivation, for writing the letter, in which she asked the Roosters to provide her with six months accommodation and use of a car, and one month's income.
The Roosters had offered her accommodation for a month and use of a car, an offer that Ms Peris declined before complaining to police in mid-July.
"The truth is, isn't it, that the club had offered you shelter for a month and use of a car for the same period, and as is apparent from this letter, that was not acceptable to you," Mr Temby said.
"You were driving for more, weren't you, on the face of the letter."
Mr Temby suggested it was only after negotiations fell through with the Roosters that Ms Peris complained to police.
"And it's because of that fact that at the end of the day you went to the police," Mr Temby said.

"No, that is not correct sir," Ms Peris said.
Ms Peris faced repeated stern warnings from magistrate Gregory Grogin for adding commentary to her answers while under questioning in the witness box.
The magistrate warned her if it continued her answers would be worth "absolutely nothing".
The court also heard details of intimate text messages exchanged between Ms Peris and Kenny-Dowall as well as abusive SMS exchanges in which the couple hurled obscenities at one another.

Questioning of Ms Peris also centred on a previous relationship in which she pursued a domestic violence complaint against the father of her child.
Mr Temby suggested there were "marked similarities" between the allegations levelled in that case and allegations levelled at Mr Kenny-Dowall.
The case continues.

Shaun Kenny-Dowall: Roosters told Jessica Peris 'to keep quiet' over domestic violence allegations - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

 

[ivanhungryjak]

Ms Peris warned about adding commentary to answers

Ms Peris faced hours of cross-examination, including over her motivation, for writing the letter, in which she asked the Roosters to provide her with six months accommodation and use of a car, and one month's income.
The Roosters had offered her accommodation for a month and use of a car, an offer that Ms Peris declined before complaining to police in mid-July.
"The truth is, isn't it, that the club had offered you shelter for a month and use of a car for the same period, and as is apparent from this letter, that was not acceptable to you," Mr Temby said.
"You were driving for more, weren't you, on the face of the letter."
Mr Temby suggested it was only after negotiations fell through with the Roosters that Ms Peris complained to police.
"And it's because of that fact that at the end of the day you went to the police," Mr Temby said.

"No, that is not correct sir," Ms Peris said.
Ms Peris faced repeated stern warnings from magistrate Gregory Grogin for adding commentary to her answers while under questioning in the witness box.
The magistrate warned her if it continued her answers would be worth "absolutely nothing".
The court also heard details of intimate text messages exchanged between Ms Peris and Kenny-Dowall as well as abusive SMS exchanges in which the couple hurled obscenities at one another.

Questioning of Ms Peris also centred on a previous relationship in which she pursued a domestic violence complaint against the father of her child.
Mr Temby suggested there were "marked similarities" between the allegations levelled in that case and allegations levelled at Mr Kenny-Dowall.
The case continues.

Shaun Kenny-Dowall: Roosters told Jessica Peris 'to keep quiet' over domestic violence allegations - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Mate, go and have a read of the texts and then come back and tell me I'm wrong when I say that was a lot worse than what Pearce did. You seem to be confused in thinking that because the assault allegations were a load of crap, everything else was.

 

[ivanhungryjak]

S: U don’t have the skills to run a businessJ: You have every right to let me go if I don’t do the right thing by you
S: U can’t even do daily s*** let alone this
J: Shaun it’s going I be a learning experience but I’m capable of doing it
To be *
S: No your not
J: Yes I am
S: Your f***ing kidding yourself
J: No I’m not
Put me down. But I’m capable
S: We wouldn’t be in the situation we are in if u were
U sit there and lie to my you didgy c***
U can get f***ed
J: Not lying about anything
S: Whatever
The sooner this happens the better
Goodluck to ya dodgy c***
J: I’m not dodgy shaun
S: F*** off sl**

This is just an example. The first conversation out of a lot more. There are far worse than this. It goes from a normal conversation to him going off like this.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/ne...s/news-story/db96192c561bb1f5a55e3666656bd604

 

[tommy]

Mate, go and have a read of the texts and then come back and tell me I'm wrong when I say that was a lot worse than what Pearce did. You seem to be confused in thinking that because the assault allegations were a load of crap, everything else was.

where can they be found?

 

[tommy]

I can't read the link. It's telling me to subscribe.Knowing the dailytelegraph they would probably only be telling one side of the story. I bolded a bit from the article I put up which is the point I was trying to make that they were both as bad as each other, not all the other stuff about the false allegations.In any case what he was saying might have been true, maybe she was incapable of running a business.

 

[ivanhungryjak]

I can't read the link. It's telling me to subscribe.Knowing the dailytelegraph they would probably only be telling one side of the story. I bolded a bit from the article I put up which is the point I was trying to make that they were both as bad as each other, not all the other stuff about the false allegations.In any case what he was saying might have been true, maybe she was incapable of running a business.

Are you being serious? That's ok then to abuse her like that?

 

[mitch222]

The biggest crime out of all this is the crime against the English language

 

[tommy]

Are you being serious? That's ok then to abuse her like that?

If that's how they BOTH spoke to each other then that's how they spoke to each other. Either way it's probably not ok but it's also not illegal. Nobody was forcing her to stay in the relationship.

 

[broncos4life]

I can't read the link. It's telling me to subscribe.Knowing the dailytelegraph they would probably only be telling one side of the story. I bolded a bit from the article I put up which is the point I was trying to make that they were both as bad as each other, not all the other stuff about the false allegations.In any case what he was saying might have been true, maybe she was incapable of running a business.

 

[tommy]

Did the article have any of the exchanges where she was being the abuser or was the whole thing slanted against SKD?

 

[ivanhungryjak]

Did the article have any of the exchanges where she was being the abuser or was the whole thing slanted against SKD?

This is like arguing with my kids. Where did I ever say it was illegal? I repeat, go and find the texts and read them then come back and say I'm wrong.

 

[tommy]

This is like arguing with my kids. Where did I ever say it was illegal? I repeat, go and find the texts and read them then come back and say I'm wrong.

There were 40 000 texts in 8 months. Why don't you put up the ones you are talking about. If you wanted to have a discussion that's fine but calling me a child is not the best way to go about it. I'll ask again, Did the article have any of the exchanges where she was being the abuser or was the whole thing slanted against SKD?

 

[Old Mate]

I spin it around a bit and imagine a drunken girl of around the same age trying to kiss a guy, any guy famous or not. In my mind he gently pushes her away and no one says a word or is outraged. Perhaps we have become a little unbalanced. Recently I endured, sorry ,listened to a young lady singing a song on the radio with the lyrics 'can't keep my hands to myself' repeated many times. It seemed to be acceptable from a young woman but I'd imagine there would be outrage about the 'message being sent' had it been a guy.

In no way am I condoning MPs actions but just making an observation on the way we as a society react, sometimes with totally disproportionate outrage.

Well said.

 

[ivanhungryjak]

There were 40 000 texts in 8 months. Why don't you put up the ones you are talking about. If you wanted to have a discussion that's fine but calling me a child is not the best way to go about it. I'll ask again, Did the article have any of the exchanges where she was being the abuser or was the whole thing slanted against SKD?

I'm done with this. I made a comment and you called me out on it. I have to do jack shit, mate. If you want to back your argument up, find the texts and prove me wrong.

 

[tommy]

I'm done with this. I made a comment and you called me out on it. I have to do jack shit, mate. If you want to back your argument up, find the texts and prove me wrong.

No thanks,I'd rather leave it.I don't see why the burden of proof falls on me.

 

[Porthoz]

No thanks,I'd rather leave it.I don't see why the burden of proof falls on me.

Being the accuser, he shouldn't have to do the work for you. You want to rebate his accusations, which he supported with " evidence", the burden of proof or creating enough doubt, is on you. :wink:

/Suits