Sproj
Immortal
Senior Staff
- Sep 6, 2013
- 54,860
- 67,027
Surely not.
I've checked, its true. Crazy. He did make a decent amount of tackles though
Surely not.
Yep. Seems impossible.Surely not.
Did Benji actually coach the Tigers this week, because I though Sheens was meant to be remaining as coach for the last 3 games this year.
I didn't watch the whole match, but i only saw Benji in the box. he also took the press conference
OK. You've stated your case well. Congratulations; it's a debate worth having. I still argue that Garrick was put in a dangerous position. During every RL match you see penalties for innocuous tackles which don't have the potential capacity to injure their opponent. Garrick was hurt, and will probably not play again this season.It doesn't come down to whether there was a careless or reckless action.
It comes down to whether the player ended up in a dangerous position. He lands on his back, so no he doesn't.
How can they blow a penalty when CNK doesn't break a single rule? What were people hoping they would penalize? Taking out the legs? There's no rule against that. The way he lands? He lands on his back, in every other tackle when a player lands on their back it's play on. You can't have it both ways.
There was nothing illegal in that tackle.
It should be pointed out that if you look at the tackle closely, you can see Garrick turn his body when he jumps. That contributes a great deal to the way it ended up. It stops CNK from getting him front on and the tackle ending up just a regular tackle.
If you're going to bring up what the players said, Garrick said it was all good. Just something that happens.
They should be changing the rule. It goes under the duty of care. They want to protect guys everywhere else. They have a rule for when a guy dives on a ball and is laying on the ground and a players just comes in and sumo flops on him as hard possible driving the shoulder in while he is doing it. You are right. If that is one of the big names and they break their back or get a long term injury it is changed within the week.OK. You've stated your case well. Congratulations; it's a debate worth having. I still argue that Garrick was put in a dangerous position. During every RL match you see penalties for innocuous tackles which don't have the potential capacity to injure their opponent. Garrick was hurt, and will probably not play again this season.
Let's see the reaction when it happens again and the player is from one of the NRL darling clubs, which includes yours, and/or the tackled player ends up missing a finals match or, worse still, ends up with a broken spine.
Ponga is so good.
They're as good as Ponga's goal kicking this year.Souths so shit though too