Browny
State of Origin Captain
- Apr 9, 2008
- 11,912
- 7,126
So is the ban for his history, repeated infringements in that game or brushing the ref?
Yes. (NSWRL probably).So is the ban for his history, repeated infringements in that game or brushing the ref?
I think with this Cap increase New Zealand Rugby will be getting worried, sooner or later NRL is going to start pillaging players from there, rather then just the youth players they are doing now.
The interest in the game will definitely stay that way, but the players themselves may be tempted when they can earn over 3 times more(if they want to stay in the Southern Hemisphere).I don't think Rugby in NZ are going to be worried about the NRL anytime soon. In fact, I think it's the opposite.
NZ is still very much a Rugby nation and they still have plenty of cash to throw around.
Well you have your big 4. O'Brien, Holbrook, Walters, Griffin... Every coach outside that group would be a long shot. But within that group of 4... tough to make a call on a favourite, would think Griffin & O'Brien would be first picks with Walters and Holbrook not far behind. Tough market to pick.courier mail put out there coach safety rankings hard to take it serious with o'brien holbrook and griffin ahead of walters imo those 3 would be my pick for most likely to get the arse if there teams arnt performing.
Walters and Griffin are safe for mine, safe enough to see out the season.
V'Landys returns serve at Wallabies coach following planned NRL raid
The newly appointed Wallabies coach has three NRL stars on his shopping list.www.zerotackle.com
I wish this guy would just shut up, he makes himself look like even more of an out of touch moron every time he speaks.
Think the sticking point is the rlpa want sole control over the funds for retired player support but the nrl want joint control or something like thatIt was alluded to on the radio that the sticking point is in regards to the entitlements & support for retired and injured players. I'd like to know the specifics, but at least it's a more admirable cause than "moar money". So I'm swinging closer to "**** the NRL". It may well be that the $ figures the NRL threw out are indeed agreed upon by both parties, so they aren't technically telling porkies, but until the entire deal is agreed to, those figures may change. Eg, the NRL say "if you want $X put aside for support & entitlements for retired players, then that comes out of the money that was designated for the players" etc.
It was alluded to on the radio that the sticking point is in regards to the entitlements & support for retired and injured players. I'd like to know the specifics, but at least it's a more admirable cause than "moar money". So I'm swinging closer to "**** the NRL". It may well be that the $ figures the NRL threw out are indeed agreed upon by both parties, so they aren't technically telling porkies, but until the entire deal is agreed to, those figures may change. Eg, the NRL say "if you want $X put aside for support & entitlements for retired players, then that comes out of the money that was designated for the players" etc.