You're entitled to your opinion. I wasn't being facetious . I think your opinion is shit. I've forgotten more than you've ever known. **** the distinction, violence is violence and should simply be condemned. If you want to keep the soft **** new age shit going, demonizing men at every turn, fine.
Woah... someone needs more of "the best a man can get".
Nothing
@holdzy89 said is demonising men. It demonises violent people, while alerting to the fact that the majority of those are men, not only because genetics gives them the advantage of size, but because male superiority (patriarchy) is ingrained in most cultures.
Portraying the above (or the Gillette ad) as an attack on men or taking offense to it, is as
@Morkel said, generally because you're part of the problem. I choose to believe that's not your case in terms of violence towards the weaker members of society, but I do dispense with your pseudo-masculinity defense, which only serves to perpetuate this idea that white males are under attack (I'm not saying that's what drives you, at least the white part).
We're not, but too many seem uncomfortable with non-white males getting the same rights as we've always historically had, and they don't understand they're the ones giving voice to a small minority of idiot feminazi (and other stupid extremists) out there.
P.S. I recently saw a guy commenting on the Gillett ad as an attack on men, and then went on to claim that women should instead respect men for going to war, and dying on the beaches of Normandy and the shores of Gallipoli for them, while they stayed home knitting...
