RANT NRL vs Broncos: The book of bullshit

[Sproj]

Is it possible the NRL picks on us because we're a bunch of WHINY LITTLE GIRLY BITCHES who think we deserve to win the premiership every year because that's how it used to be?

Is it possible we're a bunch of ENTITLED SOOKS who cry foul every time one of our players breaks a rule and gets caught?

If not, instead of CONSTANTLY WHINGING AND BITCHING let's see your organized crime chart and get to the bottom of who is telling V'Landys and his predecessors to keep picking on us.

Fox was clearly the informant and executioner in the case of Walsh just this week.

 

[BroncosFever]

Look I'm not saying they're not inconsistent (they 100% are). But we're not the only team that cops bullshit decisions.

Pretty much what I think about it too.

This thread in itself is a 100% over reaction. We lost, yes. Reece Walsh got suspended, yes. Both things were warranted, we played like shit and Walsh swore at the ref. Spin it however you want, personally I don't like to live my life playing the victim.

Not just this thread either, there are a few others that popped up. This is why nearly every other fanbase enjoys a Broncos loss, they get to come here and read a bunch of sooks having a good old fashioned sook.

 

[McHunt]

Fox was clearly the informant and executioner in the case of Walsh just this week.

You reckon Rupert is micromanaging the refs?

 

[Sproj]

You reckon Rupert is micromanaging the refs?

In this instance, the ref had nothing to do with it, I do believe he was a victim as I said but the Walsh decision was already made before he got in there and that isn’t on the ref.

 

[Mustafur]

In this instance, the ref had nothing to do with it, I do believe he was a victim as I said but the Walsh decision was already made before he got in there and that isn’t on the ref.

The case is basically a 3rd party claiming Walsh Swore at the ref despite the victim not recalling it and the suspect having two witnesses.

Even though those two witnesses admitted they talked to him before the court case the actual person who was allegedly sworn at is not even present in the case.

It's a witch hunt, there isn't enough evidence to prove he actually said it to the ref, and using previous cases where he is arguing to the ref in the game isn't applicable because he didn't swear or insult in them.

The judiciary feels like a Kangaroo court imo, it needs more Panel members because the current layout heavily favours the NRL having only 1 player and 2 non players involved in the decision making.

 

[BroncosFever]

Ref pinged him for it on the day, pretty obvious he thought he was swearing at him.

He actually should have been sent from the field.

 

[Mustafur]

Ref pinged him for it on the day, pretty obvious he thought he was swearing at him.

He actually should have been sent from the field.

The ref didn't do it for the swearing, it was for the first thing he said about not being involved.

The ref said after that he didn't recall what Walsh was saying regarding the swearing.

 

[Midean]

Ref pinged him for it on the day, pretty obvious he thought he was swearing at him.

He actually should have been sent from the field.

Should Luai have been sent for putting hands on an official?

I dont think anyone is arguing that mistreatment of the refs is ok.
Just that there is no consistency with punishments and that there seems to be a relaxed attitude towards some players and a more severe attitude towards others.

Im a whiney motherfucker because to me, there is cause for it in the way the game is run.
If the penalties and punishments where consistent, there would be a lot less noise around it.

 

[ivanhungryjak]

Ref pinged him for it on the day, pretty obvious he thought he was swearing at him.

He actually should have been sent from the field.

Yet the ref gave written evidence that he doesn’t know what he said.

 

[Organix]

Is it possible the NRL picks on us because we're a bunch of WHINY LITTLE GIRLY BITCHES who think we deserve to win the premiership every year because that's how it used to be?

Is it possible we're a bunch of ENTITLED SOOKS who cry foul every time one of our players breaks a rule and gets caught?

If not, instead of CONSTANTLY WHINGING AND BITCHING let's see your organized crime chart and get to the bottom of who is telling V'Landys and his predecessors to keep picking on us.

Ooooh it's like Scooby-Doo and they take off the mask and it was Rupert Murdoch this whole time!
Fred: "But why, Mr. Murdoch?"
Rupert: "Because your rage clicks make me a lot of money! And I would've gotten away with it too, if it weren't for you meddling BHQ posters!"

 

[Mister Wright]

I was comfortable with the Reece Walsh situation, until I listened to The Captain's Run and Kempy and Smith turned me around, and now I'm angry at the process, but agree with Kempy that Walsh needed to be levelled and this will/should do it for him.

 

[Harry Sack]

I was comfortable with the Reece Walsh situation, until I listened to The Captain's Run and Kempy and Smith turned me around, and now I'm angry at the process, but agree with Kempy that Walsh needed to be levelled and this will/should do it for him.

This. I have no issue with him copping a suspension, it's the circumstances surrounding it. Kemp and Smith raised some excellent points for mine. Anyway, I'll move on from it personally.

 

[Organix]

This. I have no issue with him copping a suspension, it's the circumstances surrounding it. Kemp and Smith raised some excellent points for mine. Anyway, I'll move on from it personally.

I just saw it as a great chance for a laugh. The banter throughout was hilarious, and the NRL is just ludicrous in how they try to look so professional, but make a mockery of everything they are trying to emulate.
It's the same with the journalists who act as though they are there doing investigative journalism of the highest order and commenting with authority on social issues hoping to win some kind of Walkley Award.
It's actually hilarious, and I've no doubt it is done in all seriousness and unironically too.
The case was "contrary conduct" and they wasted over 4 hours trying to prove Walsh swore at the ref, rather than his general conduct, only to be completely unable to prove it and then saying "we can't prove it, and the evidence provided is pointing against it, but I know you did it, so you're guilty anyway".

Like, imagine if that were a spoof of 12 Angry Men. You can't write this shit because it wouldn't be as hilarious as what we just witnessed.

 

[Kimlo]

NRL Judiciary Report: Kiwi games counted in NAS ban

Storm prop Nelson Asofa-Solomona will only miss one game at the start of the 2025 season after it was ruled that three of New Zealand's Pac Champs game would count as part of his ban.

www.nrl.com

Add it to the BS list.

 

[Browny]

Do they even proof read? The July 28 hearing lol

 

[LittleDavey]

Can we add Cobbo as the first ball carrier ever in the history of the NRL to be binned for a fucking fend?

 

[Sproj]

Can we add Cobbo as the first ball carrier ever in the history of the NRL to be binned for a fucking fend?

And that even didn't do damage.

 

[LittleDavey]

Has anyone else been cited for swearing at a ref yet too?

I'm still fuming, the officiating in this game is a deadset farce. NAS and JWH have bumpers up every second run and it's crickets. Just so sick of not getting a fair crack.