NSW Fans

So are we denying slater had a shit game in origin 3 or what?
 
Coxy said:
So are we denying slater had a shit game in origin 3 or what?

I would say he had a mixed one. Scored a try only he could, saved 3 tries with great 1 on 1 tackles, let in another and made a few mistakes. Everyone made mistakes tho, so i think simple mistakes can be let go.
 
QUEENSLANDER said:
Coxy said:
So are we denying slater had a shit game in origin 3 or what?

I would say he had a mixed one. Scored a try only he could, saved 3 tries with great 1 on 1 tackles, let in another and made a few mistakes. Everyone made mistakes tho, so i think simple mistakes can be let go.

If it was Hunt making those mistakes you would be calling for his head.
 
Overall I think Slater did more good than bad in Game 3. He was far from the worst on the field, and it was far from a bad performance.
 
Jeba said:
QUEENSLANDER said:
Coxy said:
So are we denying slater had a shit game in origin 3 or what?

I would say he had a mixed one. Scored a try only he could, saved 3 tries with great 1 on 1 tackles, let in another and made a few mistakes. Everyone made mistakes tho, so i think simple mistakes can be let go.

If it was Hunt making those mistakes you would be calling for his head.

If he had scored that try and saved those tackles i dont think i would. However, he wouldnt have made those tackles, he wouldve shoulder charged, and he wouldnt have scored that try. its a moot point
 
Anonymous person said:
Overall I think Slater did more good than bad in Game 3. He was far from the worst on the field, and it was far from a bad performance.

Well I disagree. I think he had a shocker. Yes he scored a try, but so did the Wolfman in games 2 and 3.
 
Slater played garbage in the 3rd Origin this year but he will be the number 1 for QLD next year and rightfully so.
 
schmix, Phil Rothfield is the biggest douche in the world. I love that he would rate Darius Boyd behind Luke Patten because he's only scored 1 try this year. LOLZIPOPSAFCUKINGTOOLDOESN'TKNOWTHEROLEOFAFULLBACK!
 
Jeba said:
Anonymous person said:
Overall I think Slater did more good than bad in Game 3. He was far from the worst on the field, and it was far from a bad performance.

Well I disagree. I think he had a shocker. Yes he scored a try, but so did the Wolfman in games 2 and 3.
It's no surprise that you think that though. Slater could've scored 6 tries, made 15 1-on-1 try savers, but knocked on 3 times and you'd be calling for him to be axed.
 
I love Billy Slater - but he was ordinary in the 3rd game and I'm sure he'd agree himself. Everyone I know who watched that game was in shock with his performance because even a small mistake is not something you expect to see from Slater, let alone a couple of howlers. But as Beads said, he'll be the number 1 next year and rightfully so.

It's one thing to highly rate a player...but it seems some of you rate certain players so highly that you're incapable of seeing a below par performance.
 
Conversely, Hunt could do the exact same thing and you'd still bag him.
 
Exactly Coxy - I find it endlessly amusing that if Hunt has a below par game, he can't tackle, can't do this, can't do that etc etc, but if Slater has a below par game, he still 'did more good than bad'. The anti Hunt brigade criticise anyone who dares criticise Slater for making a genuine mistake, or having a below par game, but they also refuse to give Hunt any credit for any good that he does. Seriously annoying.
 
Emma said:
It's one thing to highly rate a player...but it seems some of you rate certain players so highly that you're incapable of seeing a below par performance.
No-one's saying Slater didn't have a below par performance - he did. But even his below par is on par with the best of the rest.
 
Anonymous person said:
Emma said:
It's one thing to highly rate a player...but it seems some of you rate certain players so highly that you're incapable of seeing a below par performance.
No-one's saying Slater didn't have a below par performance - he did. But even his below par is on par with the best of the rest.

So Slater is so much better than every other fullback in the game if he play crap he is still way better than all of them ?? Your a clown get a clue get Slater peanut out of in an daround your mouth stop milking it..
 
Yes, Slater is so much better than every other fullback in the game. He didn't play 'crap' in Game 3, he scored a try only he could've and saved numerous tries with great tackles that most fullbacks would not have made. Sure, it wasn't anywhere near his best game, but it was still decent.
 
I don't get why you and Queenslander are saying he scored a try "only he could've"? He read the play (which was well practiced) and he got to the ball. He was fast, yes, but that's not unique to him.
 
I'd like to know where Slater was when support play was needed after the numerouse amount of breaks Inglis made down the left side of the field?? Isn't support play a key to a fullbacks role?
 
Back
Top