Locky was safer than Walsh. But I'm not sure safe would've won us this premiership.
You're forgetting Lockyer's composure and game management, so we wouldn't be chasing down as many points.
His kicking game would've had us in better field position so potentially storm dont score as many points.
The gameplan and errors, etc. may have been less because of Lockyer's execution of a gameplan, so less opportunities for storm to score.
You're also comparing completely different forms of the game now.
The 6 again era is completely different compared to the 00's tactics and also compared to the 90's.
Lockyer in this era may have been closer to how Cleary plays (long kicking with high intensity defence to dominate territory)... squad composition may be different to play that style.
And thats before we're talking about whether Locky is playing 1 or 6 in this comparison... Locky at 1 with this team doesnt need a Reyno at 7... but he'd make Ezra ****ing lethal.
If it's Locky at 6, who does he get as his 1... is it prime Khunt as well or even just a lesser form of Reece.
Because Locky at 6 with any form of Reece at 1 and Ezra as the other half, we're winning that by plenty.