abashii
NRL Player
- Jul 14, 2014
- 2,874
- 5,910
That's very zen. If a player touches a referee in Penrith and nobody sees, does he still miss a round?
Roberts contrary conduct
- Thread starter Porthoz
- Start date
That's very zen. If a player touches a referee in Penrith and nobody sees, does he still miss a round?
- Feb 27, 2010
- 30,278
- 12,491
- Thread starter
- #20
Not being an arse, but did you mean sighted or cited?
Taylor1921
QCup Player
- Apr 18, 2014
- 833
- 470
Roberts should not get a suspension for that. It should be up to the refs.. If the ref feels like Roberts should get suspended the. Suspend him.
- Sep 6, 2013
- 57,559
- 70,438
Imagine giving refs this power in games! Klemmer, you're a jerk, you're suspended...and sent off.
broncos4life
International Captain
- Oct 5, 2011
- 26,722
- 27,404
Both should be punished, but there is no way that the Roberts one was worse than Klemmer's
- Jan 25, 2014
- 44,773
- 34,153
JAMES Roberts is set to be charged with contrary conduct for lightly patting a referee on the chest in an apparent effort to thank him.
The pending charge, expected to be handed out on Monday, has divided opinion with Brad Fittler adamant players should be fined rather than suspended if they touch a referee innocuously.
Bulldogs prop David Klemmer is set to miss two weeks for lightly contacting referee Ben Cummins in Canterbury’s victory over Penrith.
Former match review committee chairman Greg McCallum told The Courier-Mail Roberts was certain to be charged for contrary conduct too.
The NRL is cracking down on any contact between player and referee regardless of intent, a stance NRL clubs are increasingly frustrated by.
Roberts’ referee touch was even lighter than ’s.
Brisbane may consider contesting any charge as Roberts was not looking at the referee when he touched him and did not speak to him.
They could argue he didn’t know it was a referee.
His clean record should mean he escapes suspension if he is only hit with a grade one charge.
Roberts does not have any loading or carry over points.
However, the carry-over points he could accrue this week would harm Brisbane later this year if he was charged for anything.
The Broncos were awarded a penalty in the 78th minute of Brisbane’s win over the Warriors and Roberts patted the chest of referee Matt Noyen.
“This is one of those incidents that divides opinions but he touched the referee and the NRL has for a few years now been very tough on contact between player and referee,” McCallum, who left the match review committee in 2013, said.
“I think he will be charged. I would be surprised if he wasn’t.
“Sam Moa was suspended last year for a similar incident.
“I think James’ touch wasn’t as bad as ’s who seemed fired up but unfortunately they all get rolled into the one.
“There is a strong feeling in the NRL that referees shouldn’t be touched full stop.
“I don’t think Roberts will get enough points to be suspended where as has and that will divide opinion too.”
Roberts could be the second Bronco in three years charged over touching a referee.
Sam Thaiday was suspended for one game in 2013 for grabbing Adam Devcich’s shirt to illustrate how he was held down in a tackle.
Then Broncos coach Anthony Griffin launched an uncharacteristic tirade at the NRL match review committee for charging Thaiday over his shirt tug.
The Broncos fought that charge and lost at the judiciary.
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...m/news-story/db0c20fd34d4d122eaef51d368647015
The pending charge, expected to be handed out on Monday, has divided opinion with Brad Fittler adamant players should be fined rather than suspended if they touch a referee innocuously.
Bulldogs prop David Klemmer is set to miss two weeks for lightly contacting referee Ben Cummins in Canterbury’s victory over Penrith.
Former match review committee chairman Greg McCallum told The Courier-Mail Roberts was certain to be charged for contrary conduct too.
The NRL is cracking down on any contact between player and referee regardless of intent, a stance NRL clubs are increasingly frustrated by.
Roberts’ referee touch was even lighter than ’s.
Brisbane may consider contesting any charge as Roberts was not looking at the referee when he touched him and did not speak to him.
They could argue he didn’t know it was a referee.
His clean record should mean he escapes suspension if he is only hit with a grade one charge.
Roberts does not have any loading or carry over points.
However, the carry-over points he could accrue this week would harm Brisbane later this year if he was charged for anything.
The Broncos were awarded a penalty in the 78th minute of Brisbane’s win over the Warriors and Roberts patted the chest of referee Matt Noyen.
“This is one of those incidents that divides opinions but he touched the referee and the NRL has for a few years now been very tough on contact between player and referee,” McCallum, who left the match review committee in 2013, said.
“I think he will be charged. I would be surprised if he wasn’t.
“Sam Moa was suspended last year for a similar incident.
“I think James’ touch wasn’t as bad as ’s who seemed fired up but unfortunately they all get rolled into the one.
“There is a strong feeling in the NRL that referees shouldn’t be touched full stop.
“I don’t think Roberts will get enough points to be suspended where as has and that will divide opinion too.”
Roberts could be the second Bronco in three years charged over touching a referee.
Sam Thaiday was suspended for one game in 2013 for grabbing Adam Devcich’s shirt to illustrate how he was held down in a tackle.
Then Broncos coach Anthony Griffin launched an uncharacteristic tirade at the NRL match review committee for charging Thaiday over his shirt tug.
The Broncos fought that charge and lost at the judiciary.
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...m/news-story/db0c20fd34d4d122eaef51d368647015
Last edited:
- May 21, 2013
- 19,708
- 20,983
That's fine, he won't miss any games, as long as every other person who so much as breaths on a referee from here on out is charged as well.
- Jan 25, 2014
- 44,773
- 34,153
I think they should do what they did with Glenn.
Plead no contest.
Plead no contest.
- Apr 26, 2008
- 34,578
- 35,551
Does that give him an even 100 points?
Being on 94 points with early plea is shit for later in the year.
- Jan 25, 2013
- 25,773
- 30,191
125. Gives him a week off and 25 points. Worth it.
- Apr 26, 2008
- 34,578
- 35,551
Can he take the early plea, and tell them **** you, to get an extra 6 points so he'll have 100 clean? That would be ideal.
- Jan 25, 2013
- 25,773
- 30,191
Or maybe we can "negotiate" the fine & suspension with the NRL like the Rorters got to do with Pearce?
Why's he touching the ref in the first place?
He's not his mate.
He's not a peer.
He's shouldn't be talking to him, let alone touching him.
Clearly no intent from Roberts (unlike Klemmer) but agree this should be a mandatory/strict offence.
But then you get this absurd situation with Soward decking the ref and not be scrutinised, supposedly as it was accidental.
He's not his mate.
He's not a peer.
He's shouldn't be talking to him, let alone touching him.
Clearly no intent from Roberts (unlike Klemmer) but agree this should be a mandatory/strict offence.
But then you get this absurd situation with Soward decking the ref and not be scrutinised, supposedly as it was accidental.
