S
scobie
QCup Player
- Sep 1, 2017
- 579
- 730
For all the talk of the issues with our attacking structures, or lack thereof, I think if they can tighten up defensively it would be of far greater benefit to the team. The team can put points on, but at the moment I think there's more issues when they're without the ball. Especially the right hand side. That's why I just don't think they can persist with Knik. If he was more solid in defence, I think people would be more forgiving of his lack of ability to control the game.
And it seems that teams are targeting him now on that edge, so unless he can improve his reads and tackling, I think he'll become too much of a liability. And maybe if he/the RHS defence do tighten up, it could give him the confidence at the other end of the field to step it up. I've always said confidence is more powerful than any PED, (not sure if Gallen and co would agree with that) and I think he's our best option at 7 if he gets his defence sorted.
That's why I'd be far happier to win by keeping the Eels under 10 points, even if we don't go large, than say a 36-26 sort of scoreline.
And it seems that teams are targeting him now on that edge, so unless he can improve his reads and tackling, I think he'll become too much of a liability. And maybe if he/the RHS defence do tighten up, it could give him the confidence at the other end of the field to step it up. I've always said confidence is more powerful than any PED, (not sure if Gallen and co would agree with that) and I think he's our best option at 7 if he gets his defence sorted.
That's why I'd be far happier to win by keeping the Eels under 10 points, even if we don't go large, than say a 36-26 sort of scoreline.