B
bazza
NRL Player
- Sep 24, 2013
- 1,218
- 1,531
I think the NRL should consider allowing the 18th man to be activated if a player shows Category 1 symptoms and fails the HIA, even if the head injury was not caused by foul play.
Head injuries just seem more and more common, and probably more likely than any other injury. Losing a player to a head injury for the rest of the match really changes the outcome of the match, particularly if it happens early in the match.
With an independent doctor and with the mandatory stand down period already in place, it should hopefully be enough to stop a team from rorting the system.
Head injuries just seem more and more common, and probably more likely than any other injury. Losing a player to a head injury for the rest of the match really changes the outcome of the match, particularly if it happens early in the match.
With an independent doctor and with the mandatory stand down period already in place, it should hopefully be enough to stop a team from rorting the system.