Yea, I definitely wasn’t as critical of Seibold, at least not initially - I was fully invested in the Seibold hate train by the end. I have actually historically not been very critical of anything. I wasn’t critical of Wayne or Milford, White, I defended Bird, Lodge and TPJ. It wasn’t until last year where I started being critical. People should’ve been critical of Seibold sooner.
I don’t want Kev to fail, I like the bloke. I don’t think he’s a great coach but I’ve defended him at times too and I’ve praised him for the things he’s done well. I think he actually has shown decent tactics at times (bench rotation excluded) and he’s a far easier guy to get behind than Seibold. I try to judge him as fairly as I can (outside of jokes) and thats why when he is doing things right I say he is. Unfortunately I have just found that he is awful at selecting a team list and almost just as bad at using a bench. Outside of that I’ve been happy with him.
Like the comment above about how it would be called genius if it was Bellamy (which it still wouldn’t be for the record and Bellamy actually wins games so his decisions are worth trusting) but I also wonder how many people would still defend Kev’s decisions if he wasn’t Kevin Walters? Kev might be the nicest man in rugby league and a club legend, he is given far more good will than if it was someone like Seibold making these decisions.