- Oct 28, 2013
- 12,318
- 13,100
gunna be 1 or 2 grammar/ spelling Nazis jump all over that (or going to be, I should say)
Took me a second to figure out what you were talking about.
Except*
gunna be 1 or 2 grammar/ spelling Nazis jump all over that (or going to be, I should say)
You’ve missed the point completely, so allow me to spell it out for you.Not hard to grasp if you watched it champ , players lost it in the dying seconds, then of cause the dropped ball.
We where in it and looked like taking it until some bad decisions led to a loss , had nothing to do with gameplan. But yeah whatever suits
You’ve missed the point completely, so allow me to spell it out for you.
To blame a GF loss solely on a player / the players or the coach / coaching staff is just ridiculous. Sure, some moments are bigger than others, but there are literally thousands of Sliding Doors moments in a season, it makes it impossible to isolate one without bias - whether intentional or not.
And FTR; we did not lose the 2015 GF in the final seconds, champ.
We lost it in the last 15-20 or so minutes when we completely shut-up shop and tried to defend our lead, rather than keep doing what had been working - play football.
That was the game plan - coach called it, players executed it.
The loss was not solely on Bennett, nor the players - it was on all of them as group. Same goes had we won.
Lose together, win together. To suggest otherwise only further highlights your ignorance.
Got me before I got my edit in, only just saw this now.Solely on ben hunt. Always has been, always will be.
Why would we accept you? To do that we'd have to make an EXCEPTION!It’ll be everyone accept me.
If we are going to play the rabbits I can feel it in my bones we will win and everyone on this forum will be absolutely giving it to me
Yes yes I know I got that one wrong.Why would we accept you? To do that we'd have to make an EXCEPTION!
His defence was first class last night, bringing down Lane and Paulo on a number of occasions. Tough little hombre.I just finished watching my second replay of thd match and you guys and gals claiming SOS was putrid/terrible/dreadful need to reconsider. The CM gave him 6.5 and that's fair enough but it could easily be a 7.
He was great in parts and good in others but he was far from bad. Sure a couple of his kicks were taken on the full but 90% of kicks are too. He's a must for next week and like Turps, a serious competitor and a hard little nut. Seibold would be mad to break apart Boyd and SOS. In two games they've developed more of a combination than Boyd and Turps did over 6 or more games.
Yep, yep, yeppity yep. Das me, zee grammar nazi. There's some serious clangers elsewhere too.gunna be 1 or 2 grammar/ spelling Nazis jump all over that (or going to be, I should say)
Got me before I got my edit in, only just saw this now.
See the edit to my original post.
If you truly believe what you’ve said, I have nothing more to add.
Maybe she should coach :PMrs Boyd won against the haters
better than a seibold v Bennett threadIs this the post 2015 GF thread?
All true.Regardless of what he did to get us there, he completely bottled it in the last 5 minutes as you said. Not just the drop, but events leading up to us even being in the position to concede the try.
Sorry, bit off topic.Is this the post 2015 GF thread?
We actually lost in every stat of the match last night. Significantly too in some columns. They even out scored us try wise!Wow! We thoroughly deserved that win. Credit to the boys.
Macca was left out there because he shored up our defence in the middle, but more importantly, was constantly harassing their kicker. Considering how terrible our kicking game was (think of the number of balls that were taken on the full or went over the dead ball line), that was vitally important to keep us from constantly working out of our corners.When McC went to the bin I was like ".....Oh....Oh noooooo....what ever shall we do now"
We actually lost in every stat of the match last night. Significantly too in some columns. They even out scored us try wise!
However, there's no stat for being shit hot
I just finished watching my second replay of thd match and you guys and gals claiming SOS was putrid/terrible/dreadful need to reconsider. The CM gave him 6.5 and that's fair enough but it could easily be a 7.
He was great in parts and good in others but he was far from bad. Sure a couple of his kicks were taken on the full but 90% of kicks are too. He's a must for next week and like Turps, a serious competitor and a hard little nut. Seibold would be mad to break apart Boyd and SOS. In two games they've developed more of a combination than Boyd and Turps did over 6 or more games.