Dash
State of Origin Rep
Contributor
- Dec 12, 2014
- 6,293
- 7,076
And writing off something that happens repeatedly as just a coincidence is naive.Repeating it over and over again doesn't make it true.
And writing off something that happens repeatedly as just a coincidence is naive.Repeating it over and over again doesn't make it true.
Unless he's on drugs, I don't see why they'd care.Sounds like you're accusing Darius Boyd of match fixing? You should probably contact ASADA and let them know about your inside knowledge
Dean Pay changes the fullback and hooker and gets instant results.
He copped flak from Doggies supporters in the opening rounds and was not too stubborn and rung in the changes. They trash the Tigers with some exciting brand of football. Next up the almost bash Melbourne into submission but fall short.
Seibold has to put his mark, stop listening to Lockyer, Langer, Boyd or the senior players from the 2015 heartache. Believe the young guns, start fresh and hand over the reigns to the young bulls.
Make Lodge, Fifita, Carrigan co-captains and start over again.
Yeah my bad, ASADA is just part of the agency, along with the National Integrity of Sport Unit (NISU) and the national sports integrity functions of Sport Australia that is now known as the National Sports Tribunal.Unless he's on drugs, I don't see why they'd care.
Dean Pay changes the fullback and hooker and gets instant results.
He copped flak from Doggies supporters in the opening rounds and was not too stubborn and rung in the changes. They trash the Tigers with some exciting brand of football. Next up the almost bash Melbourne into submission but fall short.
Seibold has to put his mark, stop listening to Lockyer, Langer, Boyd or the senior players from the 2015 heartache. Believe the young guns, start fresh and hand over the reigns to the young bulls.
Make Lodge, Fifita, Carrigan co-captains and start over again.
Dean Pay changes the fullback and hooker and gets instant results.
He copped flak from Doggies supporters in the opening rounds and was not too stubborn and rung in the changes. They trash the Tigers with some exciting brand of football. Next up the almost bash Melbourne into submission but fall short.
Seibold has to put his mark, stop listening to Lockyer, Langer, Boyd or the senior players from the 2015 heartache. Believe the young guns, start fresh and hand over the reigns to the young bulls.
Make Lodge, Fifita, Carrigan co-captains and start over again.
But Boyd repeatedly doing it does.
And writing off something that happens repeatedly as just a coincidence is naive.
He has taken the soft every time. In most cases I don't think it would have made a lick of difference, but he has chosen the easier option every single time.Boyd slipping over, or trying to take the intercept, on more than one occasion is definitely true. Claiming he is doing it deliberately, and avoiding tackles deliberately, is baseless and insulting, no matter how many times you want to normalise it by repeating it.
If he was deliberately avoiding collisions, why would he be defending in the line so often? It's just a bizarre accusation.
if by instant results you mean coming in last place ... then yeah he got instant results.
the Bulldogs are the last team we should be copying off
He has taken the soft every time. In most cases I don't think it would have made a lick of difference, but he has chosen the easier option every single time.
Darius made three whole tackles in the Dragons game. Clearly defending in the line isn't leading to a lot of collisions.
So 35 tackles for them vs 34 for Boyd? You're right, I withdraw my argument.No, you've perceived him to have taken the soft options on those occasions. Ignoring the times he does put his body on the line. Which he does.
Selective stats much?
* Storm - 8 tackles (Hughes 2)
* Cowboys - 8 tackles (Kahu 6)
* Dragons - 3 tackles (Widdop 13)
* Roosters - 8 tackles (Tedesco 2)
* Tigers - 7 tackles (Mmmbop 12)
He's out-tackled his opposite 3 games out of 5, including everyone's hero Tedesco. But yeah, keep imagining what you want.
Boyd slipping over, or trying to take the intercept, on more than one occasion is definitely true. Claiming he is doing it deliberately, and avoiding tackles deliberately, is baseless and insulting, no matter how many times you want to normalise it by repeating it.
If he was deliberately avoiding collisions, why would he be defending in the line so often? It's just a bizarre accusation.
No, you've perceived him to have taken the soft options on those occasions. Ignoring the times he does put his body on the line. Which he does.
Selective stats much?
* Storm - 8 tackles (Hughes 2)
* Cowboys - 8 tackles (Kahu 6)
* Dragons - 3 tackles (Widdop 13)
* Roosters - 8 tackles (Tedesco 2)
* Tigers - 7 tackles (Mmmbop 12)
He's out-tackled his opposite 3 games out of 5, including everyone's hero Tedesco. But yeah, keep imagining what you want.
Get off your high horse, we are in equal last place with the Dogs.
They will be 2 wins up before our floundering mob.
Just saw Isaako at a car park next to me, was going to talk to him about his drop balls, then saw his partner with the little one, then said nothing......
so your big plan to get us back on track is to copy a coach who finished 12th last year and is currently dead last (not to mention coming off a thrashing at the hands of a team that we only lost to in the last minute.)
that's just brilliant.
what we need to do is fix up our handling ... do that and we are 3 from 5 to start the season