broncos4life
International Captain
- Oct 5, 2011
- 26,478
- 27,136
unfortunately, that is part of what happened ... whether you like it or not
Yeah and we have heard it 1000 fucking times.
unfortunately, that is part of what happened ... whether you like it or not
Unbiased reporting like this?
I thought you wanted unbiased reporting ... apparently not.
you just want the bias to go our way instead of against it.
so in that case everyone should stop complaining about the likes of Rothfield and Kent, because it just makes you look like hypocrites ... either you want balanced unbiased journalism, or you don't ... can't have it both ways
how is that biased ... it is reporting what the victims allege ...
she never said that Lodge didn't show remorse, just what the victims have alleged. (hell, she even used that word allege. maybe you should look that word up)
Yeah and we have heard it 1000 fucking times.
I know we have insulted your girlfriend and I apologise for that. This isn’t unbiased reporting. It is more of the same masked by a headline suggesting it was about redemption.
This is the most balanced unbiased piece of league reporting that i have seen in a very long time (at least when not written by Big Pete) ... and you along with may others are complaining about that fact ...
if you didn't realise that signing Lodge would get this sort of publicity (especially before the season kicks off) then you are extremely foolish, naive, blind or a combination of the 3
in absence of facts you resort to you usual BS ... maybe we should just let Rothfield and Kent run the league reporting, would that make you happy
To be fair the end of the article starts to move away and at least try to resemble a redemption piece... but how do you have a 2 hour interview and not come out with a single quote and then talk about them needing to come out and give his side of the story, etc. You literally just had a 2hr interview to do thatBy the end of the meeting he was on the other side of the room.
Was he nervous? Or was he avoiding my questions?
It seems avoidance is something Matt relies on when challenged.
I wanted to hear what happened on the night he went on a violent rampage in New York.
He claims he doesn’t remember, he blacked out.
He doesn’t want to talk about being arrested at gunpoint, and thrown in the infamous Rikers Island Jail.
He blames the episode on sleeping pills given to him by a club doctor.
What do his parents, both respected police officers think of his crimes? He shrugs his shoulders.
As we enter the 2018 season, Lodge has so far avoided the ethical and very emotional debate on his return to the NRL.
Seriously she had a 2 hour interview and there doesn't appear to be one quote from him. At the start it sounded like it would be a league life feature but by the end it was just another character assassination.
To me the underlined sections below are just simply cheap shots included to fuel the rage of a biased reader or sway a neutral.
To be fair the end of the article starts to move away and at least try to resemble a redemption piece... but how do you have a 2 hour interview and not come out with a single quote and then talk about them needing to come out and give his side of the story, etc. You literally just had a 2hr interview to do that
I'm not going to get into the debate on whether he should be playing or not... I'm just fucking over the hypocrisy from all areas of the media
in absence of facts you resort to you usual BS ... maybe we should just let Rothfield and Kent run the league reporting, would that make you happy
**** me, some people are so enraged about this all out media attack on the Broncos, they can't see the forest through the trees.
If you have to ask, you probably can't see the forest.Care to elaborate?
It’s amazing you bring them up, because if they had written this you would be bagging it out just as bad. However, because your ‘vonny’ wrote it you can’t see it for what it is.
**** me, some people are so enraged about this all out media attack on the Broncos, they can't see the forest through the trees.