Slater + Inglis Want To Join Broncos

Inglis to play left centre, Folau if that falls through and never slater.
 
lynx000 said:
Yeh, fair points bull

If you're looking for a guy who gets busted up because of his physical style of play, look no further than Steve Matai. He's a player who has ZERO regard for his own self preservation along with anyone he's running at or who is running at him .. When he retires from football he really doesn't want to live anywhere where it gets cold in winter because his body is going to be seeking some serious revenge on him
 
I say lets step up the GI talk and make it happen now that Folau is leaving.
 
Donny said:
I say lets step up the GI talk and make it happen now that Folau is leaving.

I would say talks to that effect (whether with GI or others) have been in play for weeks knowing in all likelihood Folau would jump ship.
 
Coxy said:
Donny said:
I say lets step up the GI talk and make it happen now that Folau is leaving.

I would say talks to that effect (whether with GI or others) have been in play for weeks knowing in all likelihood Folau would jump ship.

Don't we need Inglis to ask to be released or be told to look elsewhere by the Storm for us to sign him>??? [icon_shru
 
Bucking Beads said:
Coxy said:
Donny said:
I say lets step up the GI talk and make it happen now that Folau is leaving.

I would say talks to that effect (whether with GI or others) have been in play for weeks knowing in all likelihood Folau would jump ship.

Don't we need Inglis to ask to be released or be told to look elsewhere by the Storm for us to sign him>??? [icon_shru

Yes.
 
Bucking Beads said:
Coxy said:
Donny said:
I say lets step up the GI talk and make it happen now that Folau is leaving.

I would say talks to that effect (whether with GI or others) have been in play for weeks knowing in all likelihood Folau would jump ship.

Don't we need Inglis to ask to be released or be told to look elsewhere by the Storm for us to sign him>??? [icon_shru
Yes but the fact is he will have to be released. No way they will let go of Smith or Cronk IMO it's Slater and or Inglis who are going to go.
They are about 1.4m over for next year they HAVE TO offload players.
 
I read yesterday that the investigation has so far revealed the Storm intended paying $5.4 million for their squad next year.

The salary cap is going up to $4.4 million next year.

Tolman and Finch are going which apparently reduces the salary bill to about $4.9 million, so they need to offload another $500K.
 
Coxy said:
I read yesterday that the investigation has so far revealed the Storm intended paying $5.4 million for their squad next year.

The salary cap is going up to $4.4 million next year.

Tolman and Finch are going which apparently reduces the salary bill to about $4.9 million, so they need to offload another $500K.
Isn't Tolman just a junior who has come through the grades? He would probably be on a low salary and both have to be replaced by minimum wage players who are 55k minus 110k off your figure. IMO they still have to release either Inglis or Slater and 1-2 solid first graders.

Apparently Blair is in solid talks with the Bulldogs and is all but gone as well.
 
Well that would bring them to around 400-500k over which means Inglis to broncos hopefully!

I really hope Inglis doesn't swap codes.
 
If the Broncos dont get Inglis I think we could be in for a tough season without the "strike" weapon in the backline. Hodges is definately a strike weapon but he is always injured or suspended so we need Ingliss next year!!!!

I just hope we dont go for some older player who we pay massive overs for ie: Brent Tate!!!!!
 
Donny said:
If the Broncos dont get Inglis I think we could be in for a tough season without the "strike" weapon in the backline. Hodges is definately a strike weapon but he is always injured or suspended so we need Ingliss next year!!!!

I just hope we dont go for some older player who we pay massive overs for ie: Brent Tate!!!!!
I read in some article yesterday that the Broncos are interested in Tate. Although he's not the worst choice, I'd certainly prefer GI.
 
audragon said:
Donny said:
If the Broncos dont get Inglis I think we could be in for a tough season without the "strike" weapon in the backline. Hodges is definately a strike weapon but he is always injured or suspended so we need Ingliss next year!!!!

I just hope we dont go for some older player who we pay massive overs for ie: Brent Tate!!!!!
I read in some article yesterday that the Broncos are interested in Tate. Although he's not the worst choice, I'd certainly prefer GI.

God please no!!!!!!! Who ever is the unlucky sod who plays outside of him will never see the ball.

Tate has had what..........three serious knee problems in the past three years. He WAS a good player but I definately think we can spend the money a lot better. I'd prefer Matt Rogers over tate. Rogers can play a lot more positions and can kick.

GI is a must for 2011!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Definitely not Tate, he had his time here and he's getting on, GI is young, superstar and plays left centre.
Hodges + Inglis centre pairing is pure jizz.
 
broncospwn said:
Definitely not Tate, he had his time here and he's getting on, GI is young, superstar and plays left centre.
Hodges + Inglis centre pairing is pure jizz.

As opposed to diluted jizz?
 
mal said:
broncospwn said:
Definitely not Tate, he had his time here and he's getting on, GI is young, superstar and plays left centre.
Hodges + Inglis centre pairing is pure jizz.

As opposed to diluted jizz?

Yeah man, you don't want your jizz watered down.
 

Active Now

  • Organix
  • Davewar
  • PT42
  • eggstar10
  • BroncosAlways
  • JoeldTrafford
  • Dash
  • Harry Sack
Top
  AdBlock Message
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.