Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
which should have never be brought back
Why should they never have been brought back?
Because they failed to meet the National Rugby League's selection criteria.
What? Are you saying they knew that they would get their act together 10 years down the track? There was no valid reason to bring them back, certainly not common sense!Yes, but in hindsight, bringing them back has proven to be beneficial for the NRL, no?
Using common sense always beats following black and white rules in my book.
What? Are you saying they knew that they would get their act together 10 years down the track? There was no valid reason to bring them back, certainly not common sense!
Sydney had, as it does now, way too many teams in the NRL.
If the Sharks are kicked out of the NRL, but are brought back a year later because of how loud people whinge, and happen to do well in the comp 10 years later, would that make it common sense? Let's be serious please.
They were, by the court's choice, which went against the NRL's criteria, and all because of a load of whingers.You make out as if they were bought back by choice.
**** Souths, the scummy club who decided it would be ok if they took a verbally signed player of ours. Never forget. EAD Rusty, EAD Inglis, EAD Souths.
To Twiztid and PB, commiserations guys. You're good people.
But still **** Souths.
Seems like a few have been waiting all season to finally use that lol at Souths line, guess tonight is their chance, although I'm not sure why... making it to the preliminary final is nothing to be scoffed at. I'd rather be playing in that than finishing my season at the start of September. LOL@BR0NXXX!