- Feb 25, 2015
- 2,108
- 5,178
Herbie strikes me as an out and out team player. I think he'd go off next to Staggs. Can you imagine those two - hard to tackle guys running riot. bellisimaDoes he want to play wing though? He’d be great outside Staggs.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Herbie strikes me as an out and out team player. I think he'd go off next to Staggs. Can you imagine those two - hard to tackle guys running riot. bellisimaDoes he want to play wing though? He’d be great outside Staggs.
I hope that’s the case. Reports of him wanting to leave to play right centre have me thinking otherwise though.Herbie strikes me as an out and out team player. I think he'd go off next to Staggs. Can you imagine those two - hard to tackle guys running riot. bellisima
I think he's stated that's his preference - although he resigned with us when he had a number of clubs coming after him last time and we were going through dark times - resigning at the end of July 2020.I hope that’s the case. Reports of him wanting to leave to play right centre have me thinking otherwise though.
By no means cast him aside. I just wouldn't be tabling him anything like Herbie. We need to fill that slot in the 30, he likely qualifies for the Veteran and Developed Player allowance - possibly our only one? So give him all of that.I agree with the idea of playing Herbie on a wing if he was happy to do it but even then, I just don't want to cheer against Oatesy. He is such a likeable guy and so popular with fans and other players. At times a bit of loyalty needs to be shown both ways. I wouldn't mind a two year deal with the second year in our favour.
And I don't know if he'd get much more elsewhere either. I can't see him going elsewhere and I'd be devastated if the club lets it happen. Would be like Petero all over again.By no means cast him aside. I just wouldn't be tabling him anything like Herbie. We need to fill that slot in the 30, he likely qualifies for the Veteran and Developed Player allowance - possibly our only one? So give him all of that.
That plus min wage would be what, 300k / season + TPAs? That's still nothing to sneeze at.
I've lost count of the amount of young players we have tried with, I just don't think we are in a position to build him up. It would help if he can play other positions but he is unsuitable for anything other then fullback.You're a bit trigger happy there regarding Niu, he hasn't been great for us this season and his injuries are becoming a concern but he's still only young.
He also re-signed recently.
Is there a time limit on that though? Say hypothetically Tedesco blows his knee out and because of his age he's just unable to come back from it. If memory serves me right, he did his knee a couple of times when he was young. Same knee, same ligaments, but different injury. Does that count as pre existing?"Player had no similar injury or medical condition to that area of the body that either has or could reasonably be predicted medically to lead to a degenerative condition of that area of the body prior to signing his last NRL contract"
I would say no, it's pre existing before he signs the contract.
Is there a time limit on that though? Say hypothetically Tedesco blows his knee out and because of his age he's just unable to come back from it. If memory serves me right, he did his knee a couple of times when he was young. Same knee, same ligaments, but different injury. Does that count as pre existing?
So if TMM signs a new contract it doesn't count as pre existing anymore?Last contract. So Manly signed Stewart Matai and Watmough knowing they had knee and neck problems so when they were done 10 games in the request for medical retirement was denied. Manly had to cover all three on the cap.
So if TMM signs a new contract it doesn't count as pre existing anymore?
Original Contract - Cowboys when he got the injuryNo it existed when he signed his last contract which would be his new Broncos’ contract.
Original Contract - Cowboys when he got the injury
Contract 1 - Broncos 1yr
Contract 2 - Broncos extend for 2-3 years
Is contract 2 classed as an extension of contract 1, or a new contract? If he hasn't suffered a recurrence of the injury during contract 1, does the pre-existing injury exist in the last contract....which is contract 1 now?
If it does, lets sign him for next year only......then 2 months later extend him for another year :D