Old Mate
NRL Player
- Jul 5, 2008
- 2,864
- 2,496
Wallace is a good tough footballer and I can see him filling in as a utlity role (he played 6,7 and 13 at Penrith) until the end of this year. I'd much rather him in the 17 than Baptiste or Capewell FFS - surely every one agrees on that point?
**** what results are showing in attack. A true show of where a team is at in terms of committment is defence. Wallace never backs away and is rock solid in defence (save for that Barba effort).
Can't anyone see the benefit in 7. Hunt and 14. Wallace?
Whatever happens for the rest of this year, I think Hook has to not be afraid to blood some youth.
Finals 2009 vs. Storm after Wallace was injured in prelims - we shift Lockyer to 7, Carroll (?) to 6 and it goes to shit. Hunt was put in cotton wool.
Finals 2011 vs. Manly after Lockyer was injured - we shift Gillett to 6, and Norman was put in cotton wool. It all goes to shit.
So you shift Hunt to 7, Wallace to 14 and who goes to 5/8? Don't you dare say Norman because he doesn't belong there. Wallace or nobody in the halves.
We'd be better off with Beale at 5/8 than Norman.