Search results

  1. F

    Lazarus -> Webcke -> ?

    LOL at The ROCK! The admin with the least knowledge on these forums. Kenny has been the only forward that looks half interested in running hard. Get your eyes check mate, while you\'re at it, get a haircut!
  2. F

    Lazarus -> Webcke -> ?

    Hannant has be rubbish when the Broncos needed him the most. Isn\'t he suppose to be the next Webcke? Not even close!
  3. F

    Lazarus -> Webcke -> ?

    The Broncos has always build their premierships around a world class prop. In fact, Wayne even purchased one in The Brick. It\'s time for one of the current Broncos\' props to stand up. Hannant has been rubbish all year, and seems like his mind is on next year with the Dogs . Clinton has so...
  4. F

    Broncos v Dragons - Pre & Post-Game Discussion

    Shift Robinson to the centres and Boyd to the wing.
  5. F

    Without Hodges the Broncos are nothing in attack.

    The only time Boyd looks threating is when he forgets to gel his hair before the match
  6. F

    Without Hodges the Broncos are nothing in attack.

    LOL @ Boyd looks more dangerous. The only danger Boyd has with ball in hand is the touchline FFS!
  7. F

    Without Hodges the Broncos are nothing in attack.

    For the balance of the team, Boyd is better off on the wing than in the centres. Emmett can cover the centres and at least look threating with the ball in the centres.
  8. F

    Without Hodges the Broncos are nothing in attack.

    Er, Manihera is a QLD cup standard winger. If you think otherwise, you have rocks in your head.
  9. F

    Without Hodges the Broncos are nothing in attack.

    Manihera. He's solid but for the sake of the team, Boyd is better off on the wing than in the centres.
  10. F

    Without Hodges the Broncos are nothing in attack.

    I said i rather Emmett over Boyd but doesn't mean I think Emmett is a great centre. Boyd is a finisher, and should be left on the wing.
  11. F

    Without Hodges the Broncos are nothing in attack.

    Tell many how many good games Boyd has played in the centres? And compare to how many average games he has played there. Thankyou icon_thumbs_u
  12. F

    Without Hodges the Broncos are nothing in attack.

    Getting back on topic. Boyd should never play centre. He's a winger and a winger only. I rather Nick Emmett than him in the centres. Also, with Thaiday and Carroll out, why the heck isn't Palmer Wapou in the side? He's in the mold of Thaiday, runs hard and has a bit mongrel in him.
  13. F

    Without Hodges the Broncos are nothing in attack.

    So it's ok for him to call me a spastic?
  14. F

    Without Hodges the Broncos are nothing in attack.

    Getting back on topic. Boyd should never play centre. He's a winger and a winger only. I rather Nick Emmett than him in the centres. Also, with Thaiday and Carroll out, why the heck isn't Palmer Wapou in the side? He's in the mold of Thaiday, runs hard and has a bit mongrel in him.
  15. F

    Without Hodges the Broncos are nothing in attack.

    Why do you have to resort to name calling you ******? [icon_drun Read the title of the thread you clown. It's about the Broncos' attack. Don't go posting how Hunt is a better overall player where clearly this thread is about the Broncos attack. Start you own thread: "HUNT IS A BETTER PLAYER...
  16. F

    Without Hodges the Broncos are nothing in attack.

    Mal, I look forward to recieving your centrelink payment this week. You\'re a clown if you think Hunt is a better attacking player than Hodges. Hodges is the xfactor in the team, just like how redtube is the xfactor in your relationship.
  17. F

    Without Hodges the Broncos are nothing in attack.

    I have to agree with you briareos Our attack seems flatter than Stephanie Rice
  18. F

    Without Hodges the Broncos are nothing in attack.

    You bet your last dollar that teams are more concern with Lockyer and Hunt than Lockyer and Hodges? I\\\'ll private message my netbank details on Thursday, so you can wire me your dole payment. I was not sucking SBW\\\'s **** in 04. He was sucking mine cause I\\\'m the man. But Mundine is...
  19. F

    Without Hodges the Broncos are nothing in attack.

    Hunt runs the ball back hard and is great on the second man play. However, he\\\'s not the type of player that could hurt you from anywhere on the field and makes something out of nothing. Teams don\\\'t fear Hunt, like they fear Hodges. Hence, why Hodges is the xfactor. TOUCHDOWN!
  20. F

    Without Hodges the Broncos are nothing in attack.

    Let\'s put Hodges and all the other outside back on the open market. And let\'s see which player teams would chase most. I bet you a 6 pack of Lemon Ruski that Hodges would be the player that teams would chase. You have to remember Lockyer is coming to the end of his wonderful career.

Active Now

  • Allo
  • Johnny92
  • Broncorob
Top
  AdBlock Message
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.