N
_noosh
NYC Player
- Oct 3, 2016
- 227
- 213
I don't know why I thought the idea hadn't been made previously. :rolleyes:
If it does work, it would solve a few of the problems with our line-up imo
I don't know why I thought the idea hadn't been made previously. :rolleyes:
If it does work, it would solve a few of the problems with our line-up imo
austin71
NRL Player
- Apr 21, 2013
- 1,325
- 368
Id be a little concerned if we lost Hunt and replaced him with Lolohea.. That would mean
6.Lolohea
7.Milf
We are already struggling with onfield game management. Would only make things worse Imo.
6.Lolohea
7.Milf
We are already struggling with onfield game management. Would only make things worse Imo.
Dexter
State of Origin Rep
Contributor
- Mar 26, 2008
- 7,822
- 6,714
What about defence ? His mistakes reading under pressure leave a bit to be desired.
Mitchell_Broncos
NRL Player
- Jun 21, 2016
- 1,714
- 1,058
He is a bit rusty when it comes to 5th and last and someone kicks it into the in goal and he has to either pick it up or knock it out but a bit of training on that and he should be right
Broncoman
State of Origin Rep
- Oct 9, 2011
- 7,691
- 1,118
Is Oates capable of throwing a good pass under pressure?
Mitchell_Broncos
NRL Player
- Jun 21, 2016
- 1,714
- 1,058
I have never really seen him as the man to do fancy passes or just pass in general, he mainly just gets passed and scores or kicks, I have seen him kick twice in the pass and that is for Milford to score and he mainly just runs it up so instead of chucking him in centre chuck him back in his old position 'Second Row'.
I cant see him being the man for centre to pass.
N
_noosh
NYC Player
- Oct 3, 2016
- 227
- 213
Yeah true. We have seen nothing of his passing game so there's a chance he doesn't have any. Although, we don't see much passing from wingers anyway.
I still think it's worthy of a shot, especially if Opacic will miss the first few games anyway. I can't see Oates being moved into the second row this coming year, even with his flaky games recently. Especially because I can't see him getting a spot over the other Second Row contenders we have at the moment, and I doubt he'd be dropped completely.
If his defence is strong, and his passing game isn't bad, with him as left centre our lineup would be much stronger as a whole imo.
Tunza's Chin
QCup Player
- Apr 17, 2016
- 273
- 131
A well thought out argument re Oates at centre.
However personally I don't want Oates at centre. I think acceleration and good hands are the most important attributes for a centre attacking wise. In defence lateral movement, decision making and communication - the last two go hand in hand.
Oates strengths don't lie in any of those areas. His size is nice and he'd stop anyone running straight, and do well doing the same in attack. But they are more suitable attributes for an edge forward then a centre.
However personally I don't want Oates at centre. I think acceleration and good hands are the most important attributes for a centre attacking wise. In defence lateral movement, decision making and communication - the last two go hand in hand.
Oates strengths don't lie in any of those areas. His size is nice and he'd stop anyone running straight, and do well doing the same in attack. But they are more suitable attributes for an edge forward then a centre.
Morkel
International Captain
Contributor
- Jan 25, 2013
- 25,577
- 29,835
I've done a 180 on Oates. For two reasons. One, if his injury concerns are genuine, we'll likely get 4-5 years extra out of him on the wings. And two, because he offers more as a big tall winger who can run fast and finish than a back-rower who can run fast and finish. For mine, he brings everything that we benefited from with Vidot - the crucial starts to the sets dragging 3-4 defenders - plus genuine speed and the ability to finish with the best of them. He's got some over the line in the corner that you'd expect someone half his size to bomb.
It's the same argument I had 5 years ago when Idris was carving up at centre. "Move him to the back-row, he's big enough" was the call. But why? There are plenty of back-rowers who can fit the criteria of having decent size and the ability to run hard. Why limit someone to such a narrow criteria when they have so much more to offer? Why run someone regularly against 2-3 defenders and make them do 20 - 30 tackles when they can be utilised one-on-one against generally smaller opposition and steamroll/fend/outrun them? If they can handle the increased short-burst intricacies, such as lateral movement in defence against fast opponents, the ability to turn and chase, and be safe under the high ball, there is far more value in sharpening the broadsword and using it to slice through than blunting it and trying to use it as a battering ram.
01 Boyd
02 Oates
03 Kahu
04 Roberts
05 Mead / Pearson
is what I would run with until Opacic is healthy. It means we don't have to rush him back and end up with Jack Reed 2.0. Let him get 110% and warm him up in Q-Cup, then he can try to force his way in to the side.
It's the same argument I had 5 years ago when Idris was carving up at centre. "Move him to the back-row, he's big enough" was the call. But why? There are plenty of back-rowers who can fit the criteria of having decent size and the ability to run hard. Why limit someone to such a narrow criteria when they have so much more to offer? Why run someone regularly against 2-3 defenders and make them do 20 - 30 tackles when they can be utilised one-on-one against generally smaller opposition and steamroll/fend/outrun them? If they can handle the increased short-burst intricacies, such as lateral movement in defence against fast opponents, the ability to turn and chase, and be safe under the high ball, there is far more value in sharpening the broadsword and using it to slice through than blunting it and trying to use it as a battering ram.
01 Boyd
02 Oates
03 Kahu
04 Roberts
05 Mead / Pearson
is what I would run with until Opacic is healthy. It means we don't have to rush him back and end up with Jack Reed 2.0. Let him get 110% and warm him up in Q-Cup, then he can try to force his way in to the side.
J
jamesqld
NYC Player
- Jun 6, 2013
- 129
- 147
This basically sums up my thoughts.
It will be good having a bit of healthy competition in the backs next year.
Alec
International Rep
- Mar 4, 2008
- 19,400
- 12,528
The only problem with Oates on the wing is that he has feet for hands. You can count on him dropping the ball from a kick at least once a game.
P
Pushkin
QCup Player
- May 27, 2016
- 477
- 165
So total 5 players select for four nation. Do anyone knows Broncos gone play World Club series next year?
Danoz Direct
NRL Captain
- Oct 12, 2013
- 3,800
- 1,285
- Thread starter
- #265
No we are not. We didn't place high enough this year.
Mitch06
NRL Player
- Jan 23, 2014
- 1,580
- 580
I think you'll find we go despite where we finished.
Danoz Direct
NRL Captain
- Oct 12, 2013
- 3,800
- 1,285
- Thread starter
- #267
I'm pretty sure it is 1st, 2nd and 3rd who go now, not just anyone who wants to...
Anyway it is better we don't no one so far has gone over there in the pre-season and come back and won the premiership.
We just need to rest up and get ready for the long season ahead.
Allo
International Rep
Forum Staff
- Sep 28, 2012
- 13,066
- 11,238
Didn't matter the first year. We just scraped into the 8 and the Dragons weren't even in it.
Danoz Direct
NRL Captain
- Oct 12, 2013
- 3,800
- 1,285
- Thread starter
- #269
Changed since then.
Mitch06
NRL Player
- Jan 23, 2014
- 1,580
- 580
My bad, hence the Roosters, Cowboys and us going last year.
Last edited:
