- Aug 27, 2008
- 2,819
- 4,002
Good standard? Debatable, but probably good enough club level, but is he a good origin standard? I don't think so.Talakai isn't a bad bench option. He covers centres, edge and middle all to a good standard.
Good standard? Debatable, but probably good enough club level, but is he a good origin standard? I don't think so.Talakai isn't a bad bench option. He covers centres, edge and middle all to a good standard.
Freddy can’t coach & Cleary can’t play without half of Penrith in the side.
It’s pretty obvious qld is going to get reamed by the refs after all the nsw sulking & media campaigning about the ruck.Cleary can't play when the ref doesn't allow him to play in a dinner suit. The refs would normally hold the opposition back 12 metres and be calling players back if they were to pressure him. He didn't get that luxury in Origin and it showed. Let's see how the refs go this time after almost certainly being chastised for their actions.
How has he not been playing to a good standard? Last year for the Sharks he was great in the middle. Just because he hasn't been scoring 2 tries a game and dominating like he did against Manly, doesn't mean the bloke isn't playing well.Good standard? Debatable, but probably good enough club level, but is he a good origin standard? I don't think so.
HiHow has he not been playing to a good standard? Last year for the Sharks he was great in the middle. Just because he hasn't been scoring 2 tries a game and dominating like he did against Manly, doesn't mean the bloke isn't playing well.
Can you explain why you think it's debatable that he has been playing well? His form has been very impressive.HiBooKhaki ..... please note I did say it was debatable, ie 50/50, but probably good enough. The point was that I don't think he is Origin standard.
Bloody 1994. Game 1 was so epic, it got me hooked on footy for life. Then we lost the series. Argh.NSW have only managed to win 1 series from 7 after losing the first game at home.
1988 - Lost Game I 26-18 (Allianz), lost Game II 16-6 (Suncorp), lost Game III 38-22 (Allianz)
1994 - Lost Game I 16-12 (Allianz), won Game II 14-0 (MCG), won Game III 27-12 (Suncorp)
1995 - Lost Game I 2-0 (Allianz), lost Game II 20-12 (MCG), lost Game III 24-16 (Suncorp)
1998 - Lost Game I 24-23 (Allianz), won Game II 26-10 (Suncorp), lost Game III 19-4 (Allianz)
2010 - Lost Game I 28-24 (ANZ), lost Game II 34-6 (Suncorp), lost Game III 23-18 (ANZ)
2015 - Lost Game I 11-10 (ANZ), won Game II 26-18 (MCG), lost Game III 52-6 (Suncorp)
2016 - Lost Game I 6-4 (ANZ), lost Game II 26-16 (Suncorp), won Game III 18-14 (ANZ)
Overall they have lost the opening game 20 times and have only managed to go on to win the series 3 times, with 1 being a drawn series in which QLD retained the shield.
Out of the 20 times they have lost the opening game, they have won the second game 12 times. QLD have clean sweeped the series 4 times.
Hey mate, well the simple answer as to why it's debatable, is there are people that think he is great, and there are others who think he is a flat-track bully. That by its very definition means it is debatable.Can you explain why you think it's debatable that he has been playing well? His form has been very impressive.
What makes you think he isn't origin standard?
agreedHey mate, well the simple answer as to why it's debatable, is there are people that think he is great, and there are others who think he is a flat-track bully. That by its very definition means it is debatable.
You look at the truly great players, you don't see any arguments (even from opposition fans) about how good they are, it's plain as day for everyone to see.
There isn't universal agreement on the big T and therefore it's debatable :)
As to my personal opinions on him, I think he had 1 breakout game, and ever since there's been a media circle jerk over him, and some people are buying in. Maybe I am being too harsh though, perhaps it would be better to say that I don't think he is as good as the media are portraying.
Anyway, it's all just opinion :)
Nobody is saying Talakai is a truly great player, he is a bench player for NSW.Hey mate, well the simple answer as to why it's debatable, is there are people that think he is great, and there are others who think he is a flat-track bully. That by its very definition means it is debatable.
You look at the truly great players, you don't see any arguments (even from opposition fans) about how good they are, it's plain as day for everyone to see.
There isn't universal agreement on the big T and therefore it's debatable :)
As to my personal opinions on him, I think he had 1 breakout game, and ever since there's been a media circle jerk over him, and some people are buying in. Maybe I am being too harsh though, perhaps it would be better to say that I don't think he is as good as the media are portraying.
Anyway, it's all just opinion :)
Username checks outView attachment 18942
Really? Who gives a **** about postcodes......? Surely an iconic QLD sponsor holds more weight? Can't we just have everybody's hometown "postcode" written within the players bio.......like they generally do..... every other fucken year?
View attachment 18942
Really? Who gives a **** about postcodes......? Surely an iconic QLD sponsor holds more weight? Can't we just have everybody's hometown "postcode" written within the players bio.......like they generally do..... every other fucken year?